Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30786225›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of neuroscience2019

Acoustic Pattern Recognition and Courtship Songs: Insights from Insects.

Christa A Baker, Jan Clemens, Mala Murthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. High acoustic diversity and behavioral complexity of katydids in the Mesozoic soundscape.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christa A BakerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA; email: mmurthy@princeton.edu.
Jan ClemensUniversity Medical Center Goettingen, Max-Planck-Society, European Neuroscience Institute, D-37077 Goettingen, Germany; email: clemensjan@gmail.com.
Mala MurthyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA; email: mmurthy@princeton.edu.

Funding

Uncovering the Neural Mechanisms that Flexibly Link Sensory Processing to BehaviorR35NS111580 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Mala Murthy · 2019 to 2026
$5.0M
How does the brain solve the pattern recognition problem?DP2NS092378 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MURTHY, MALA · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
Dissecting Sensorimotor Pathways Underlying Social Interactions: Models, Circuits, and BehaviorR01NS104899 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, MURTHY, MALA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS092378NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104899NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS111580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across the animal kingdom, social interactions rely on sound production and perception. From simple cricket chirps to more elaborate bird songs, animals go to great lengths to communicate information critical for reproduction and survival via acoustic signals. Insects produce a wide array of songs to attract a mate, and the intended receivers must differentiate these calls from competing sounds, analyze the quality of the sender from spectrotemporal signal properties, and then determine how to react. Insects use numerically simple nervous systems to analyze and respond to courtship songs, making them ideal model systems for uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying acoustic pattern recognition. We highlight here how the combination of behavioral studies and neural recordings in three groups of insects-crickets, grasshoppers, and fruit flies-reveals common strategies for extracting ethologically relevant information from acoustic patterns and how these findings might translate to other systems.

Indexed as

CourtshipAnimalsAnimal StructuresDrosophilaFemaleForecastingGrasshoppersGryllidaeInsectaMaleMating Preference, AnimalPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalSense OrgansSexual Behavior, AnimalSpecies SpecificityTemperatureanimal communicationauditory circuitsauditory processingcourtship songstemporal pattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID30786225
PMCPMC6885008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.