ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2019
Minimally Invasive or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. Reply.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of laparoscopic surgical proficiency on survival outcomes in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a multi-center cohort study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Current analysis of the survival implications for minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of early-stage cervix cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer in Light of the LACC Trial: What Have We Learned?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30786198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.