Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785945›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Toxicity and oviposition deterrence of essential oils of Clinopodium nubigenum and Lavandula angustifolia against the myiasis-inducing blowfly Lucilia sericata.

Stefano Bedini, Guido Flamini, Francesca Cosci, Roberta Ascrizzi, Maria C Echeverria, Evelin V Gomez, Lucia Guidi, Marco Landi, Andrea Lucchi, Barbara Conti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Insects · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefano BediniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3760-9894
Guido FlaminiDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca CosciDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Roberta AscrizziDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Maria C EcheverriaFacultad de Ingeniería en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Ibarra, Ecuador.
Evelin V GomezFacultad de Ingeniería en Ciencias Agropecuarias y Ambientales, Universidad Técnica del Norte, Ibarra, Ecuador.
Lucia GuidiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marco LandiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea LucchiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Barbara ContiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7861-1536
University of Pisa · ITUniversidad Técnica del Norte · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous myiasis is a severe worldwide medical and veterinary issue. In this trial the essential oil (EO) of the Andean medicinal plant species Clinopodium nubigenum (Kunth) Kuntze was evaluated for its bioactivity against the myiasis-inducing blowfly Lucilia sericata (Meigen) (Diptera Calliphoridae) and compared with that of the well-known medicinal plant species Lavandula angustifolia Mill. The EOs were analysed and tested in laboratory for their oviposition deterrence and toxicity against L. sericata adults. The physiology of EO toxicity was evaluated by enzymatic inhibition tests. The antibacterial and antifungal properties of the EOs were tested as well. At 0.8 μL cm-2, both EOs completely deterred L. sericata oviposition up to 3 hours. After 24 h, the oviposition deterrence was still 82.7% for L. angustifolia and the 89.5% for C. nubigenum. The two EOs were also toxic to eggs and adults of L. sericata. By contact/fumigation, the EOs, the LC50 values against the eggs were 0.07 and 0.48 μL cm-2 while, by topical application on the adults, LD50 values were 0.278 and 0.393 μL per individual for C. nubigenum and L. angustifolia EOs, respectively. Inhibition of acetylcholine esterase of L. sericata by EOs (IC50 = 67.450 and 79.495 mg L-1 for C. nubigenum and L. angustifolia, respectively) suggested that the neural sites are targets of the EO toxicity. Finally, the observed antibacterial and antifungal properties of C. nubigenum and L. angustifolia EOs suggest that they could also help prevent secondary infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsDipteraFemaleHumansInsect ControlInsecticidesLamiaceaeLavandulaMyiasisOils, VolatileOvipositionInsecticidesOils, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID30785945
PMCPMC6382167
OpenAlexW2915825668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.