SynthesisPloS one2019
Cost of illness and program of dengue: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Hospitalization costs of coronaviruses diseases in upper-middle-income countries: A systematic review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- The cost of oral cancer: A systematic review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Economic burden of respiratory syncytial and parainfluenza viruses in children of upper-middle-income countries: a systematic review.Jornal de pediatriaPooled it
- Field implementation of the sterile insect technique against Aedes aegypti in Recife, Brazil: operational challenges and impact of release frequency on vector dynamics.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Article
- Dengue Fever Diagnosis: Performance Characteristics of Current Tests and Emerging Detection Technologies.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Designing a multidimensional vulnerability index for supervising dengue cases from 2015 to 2020 in a low/middle-income country: A spatial principal component analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Observational
- Epidemiological Trends and Age-Period-Cohort Effects on Dengue Incidence Across High-Risk Regions from 1992 to 2021.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Vaccination strategies, public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccine TAK-003: A modeling case study in Thailand.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Dengue Vaccination: A Practical Guide for Clinicians.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention in Adults to Promote Control Behaviors Against Dengue: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Dengue.Lancet (London, England) · 2024Review
- Cost of illness studies in COVID-19: a scoping review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Article
- Economic Burden of Mosquito-Borne Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Dengue as a Disease Threatening Global Health: A Narrative Review Focusing on Latin America and Brazil.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Review
- Enhancing the scalability of Wolbachia-based vector-borne disease management: time and temperature limits for storage and transport of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti eggs for field releases.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Monetary Value of Disability-Adjusted Life Years and Potential Productivity Losses Associated With Neglected Tropical Diseases in the East African Community.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Trash to Treasure: How Insect Protein and Waste Containers Can Improve the Environmental Footprint of Mosquito Egg Releases.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The health perceptions, dengue knowledge and control willingness among Dai ethnic minority in Yunnan Province, China.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies on dengue related to the cost of illness and cost of the program are factors to describe the economic burden of dengue, a neglected disease that has global importance in public health. These studies are often used by health managers in optimizing financial resources. A systematic review of studies estimating the cost of dengue was carried out, comparing the costs between the studies and examining the cost drivers regarding the methodological choices.
methodsThis study was done according to the guidelines of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). Several databases were searched: Medline, Virtual Health Library and CRD. Two researchers, working independently, selected the studies and extracted the data. The quality of the methodology of the individual studies was achieved by a checklist of 29 items based on protocols proposed by the British Medical Journal and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. A qualitative and quantitative narrative synthesis was performed.
resultsA literature search yielded 665 publications. Of these, 22 studies are in accordance with previously established inclusion criteria. The cost estimates were compared amongst the studies, highlighting the study design, included population and comparators used (study methodology). The component costs included in the economic evaluation were based on direct and indirect costs, wherein twelve studies included both costs, twelve studies adopted the societal perspective and ten studies used the perspective of the public health service provider, or of a private budget holder.
conclusionThis study showed that the cost of dengue in 18 countries generated approximately US$ 3.3 billion Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in 2015. This confirms that the burden of dengue has a great economic impact on countries with common socioeconomic characteristics and similarities in health systems, particularly developing countries, indicating a need for further studies in these countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.