Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785881›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Using machine learning models to predict oxygen saturation following ventilator support adjustment in critically ill children: A single center pilot study.

Sam Ghazal, Michael Sauthier, David Brossier, Wassim Bouachir, Philippe A Jouvet, Rita Noumeir

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04361435 (Comparison of Two Methods to Airway Clearance in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit for COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04361435 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Two Methods to Airway Clearance in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit for COVID-19: A Pilot Corssover Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Justine's HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsCOVID-19, PhysiotherapyArmsChest physiotherapy using a non-invasive oscillating device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Estimated PaoCritical care explorations · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Methodology Based on Expert Systems for the Early Detection and Prevention of Hypoxemic Clinical Cases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sam GhazalDepartment of health information analysis, École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michael SauthierDepartment of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-4767
David BrossierDepartment of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2059-9888
Wassim BouachirLICEF research center, TÉLUQ University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Philippe A JouvetDepartment of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5684-3398
Rita NoumeirDepartment of health information analysis, École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an intensive care units, experts in mechanical ventilation are not continuously at patient's bedside to adjust ventilation settings and to analyze the impact of these adjustments on gas exchange. The development of clinical decision support systems analyzing patients' data in real time offers an opportunity to fill this gap.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether a machine learning predictive model could be trained on a set of clinical data and used to predict transcutaneous hemoglobin oxygen saturation 5 min (5min SpO2) after a ventilator setting change. DATA SOURCES: Data of mechanically ventilated children admitted between May 2015 and April 2017 were included and extracted from a high-resolution research database. More than 776,727 data rows were obtained from 610 patients, discretized into 3 class labels (< 84%, 85% to 91% and c92% to 100%). PERFORMANCE METRICS OF PREDICTIVE MODELS: Due to data imbalance, four different data balancing processes were applied. Then, two machine learning models (artificial neural network and Bootstrap aggregation of complex decision trees) were trained and tested on these four different balanced datasets. The best model predicted SpO2 with area under the curves < 0.75.

conclusionThis single center pilot study using machine learning predictive model resulted in an algorithm with poor accuracy. The comparison of machine learning models showed that bagged complex trees was a promising approach. However, there is a need to improve these models before incorporating them into a clinical decision support systems. One potentially solution for improving predictive model, would be to increase the amount of data available to limit over-fitting that is potentially one of the cause for poor classification performances for 2 of the three class labels.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolCritical IllnessDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision TreesFemaleForecastingHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMachine LearningMaleOxygenPilot ProjectsQuebecRetrospective StudiesOxygen

Identifiers

PMID30785881
PMCPMC6382156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.