Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785825›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019

Parallel distributed networks resolved at high resolution reveal close juxtaposition of distinct regions.

Rodrigo M Braga, Koene R A Van Dijk, Jonathan R Polimeni, Mark C Eldaief, Randy L Buckner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. ΔBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Old-New Recognition Memory Revisited.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Parallel systems for social and spatial cognition reaching the cortical apex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Functions of the posterior cingulate cortex and default network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rodrigo M BragaDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Koene R A Van DijkAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
Jonathan R PolimeniAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
Mark C EldaiefDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Randy L BucknerDepartment of Psychology, Center for Brain Science, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

The neural network of OCD, linking NHP and human studiesP50MH106435 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Suzanne N Haber · 2015 to 2026
$28.9M
Improving Human fMRI through Modeling and Imaging Microvascular Dynamics: Administrative SupplementR01MH111419 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI POLIMENI, JONATHAN RIZZO · 2016 to 2020
$4.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH106435NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111419Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103980/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examination of large-scale distributed networks within the individual reveals details of cortical network organization that are absent in group-averaged studies. One recent discovery is that a distributed transmodal network, often referred to as the "default network," comprises two closely interdigitated networks, only one of which is coupled to posterior parahippocampal cortex. Not all studies of individuals have identified the same networks, and questions remain about the degree to which the two networks are separate, particularly within regions hypothesized to be interconnected hubs. In this study we replicate the observation of network separation across analytical (seed-based connectivity and parcellation) and data projection (volume and surface) methods in two individuals each scanned 31 times. Additionally, three individuals were examined with high-resolution (7T; 1.35 mm) functional magnetic resonance imaging to gain further insight into the anatomical details. The two networks were identified with separate regions localized to adjacent portions of the cortical ribbon, sometimes inside the same sulcus. Midline regions previously implicated as hubs revealed near complete spatial separation of the two networks, displaying a complex spatial topography in the posterior cingulate and precuneus. The network coupled to parahippocampal cortex also revealed a separate region directly within the hippocampus, at or near the subiculum. These collective results support that the default network is composed of at least two spatially juxtaposed networks. Fine spatial details and juxtapositions of the two networks can be identified within individuals at high resolution, providing insight into the network organization of association cortex and placing further constraints on interpretation of group-averaged neuroimaging data. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recent evidence has emerged that canonical large-scale networks such as the "default network" fractionate into parallel distributed networks when defined within individuals. This research uses high-resolution imaging to show that the networks possess juxtapositions sometimes evident inside the same sulcus and within regions that have been previously hypothesized to be network hubs. Distinct circumscribed regions of one network were also resolved in the hippocampal formation, at or near the parahippocampal cortex and subiculum.

Indexed as

ConnectomeAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingassociation cortexdefault networkhippocampussubiculumUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID30785825
PMCPMC6485740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.