Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785503›Full record

ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2019

Bone callus formation is highly disrupted by dietary restriction in growing rats sustaining a femoral fracture1.

Iara Inácio Botega, Ariane Zamarioli, Patrícia Madalena San Gregório Guedes, Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva, João Paulo Mardegan Issa, Mariana Maloste Butezloff, Yara Terezinha Corrêa Silva Sousa, João Paulo Bianchi Ximenez, José Batista Volpon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in Growth Factor Delivery for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Iara Inácio BotegaFellow Master degree, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences Applied to the Locomotor System, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Design of the study, technical procedures, acquisition and interpretation of data, manuscript preparation.
Ariane ZamarioliResearcher, Laboratory of Bioengineering, School of Medicine, USP, Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Design of the study, interpretation of data, manuscript preparation, critical revision.
Patrícia Madalena San Gregório GuedesFellow Master degree, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences Applied to the Locomotor System, School of Medicine, USP, Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Technical procedures, acquisition of data.
Raquel Assed Bezerra da SilvaPhD, Associate Professor, Department of Children's Clinic, School of Dentistry, USP, Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Technical procedures, critical revision.
João Paulo Mardegan IssaPhD, Associate Professor, Department of Morphology, Physiology and Basic Pathology, School of Dentistry, USP, Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Technical procedures, critical revision.
Mariana Maloste ButezloffFellow PhD degree, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences Applied to the Locomotor System, School of Medicine, USP, Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Technical procedures.
Yara Terezinha Corrêa Silva SousaPhD, School of Dentistry, Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (UNAERP), Brazil. Technical procedures, critical revision.
João Paulo Bianchi XimenezFellow PhD degree, Postgraduate Program in Toxicology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, USP, Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Statistical analysis, technical procedures, critical revision.
José Batista VolponFull Professor, Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, School of Medicine, USP, Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. Design, intellectual and scientific content of the study; manuscript preparation, critical revision, final approval.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-7352
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRClinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto · BRMorpho (United States) · USSeparation Systems (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effects of food restriction on fracture healing in growing rats.

methodsSixty-eight male Wistar rats were assigned to two groups: (1) Control and (2) Dietary restriction. After weaning the dietary restricted animals were fed ad libitum for 42 days with 50% of the standard chow ingested by the control group. Subsequently, the animals underwent bone fracture at the diaphysis of the right femur, followed by surgical stabilization of bone fragments. On days 14 and 28 post-fracture, the rats were euthanized, and the fractured femurs were dissected, the callus was analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, micro-computed tomography, histomorphometry, mechanical tests, and gene expression.

resultsDietary restriction decreased body mass gain and resulted in several phenotypic changes at the bone callus (a delay in cell proliferation and differentiation, lower rate of newly formed bone and collagen deposition, reductions in bone callus density and size, decrease in tridimensional callus volume, deterioration in microstructure, and reduction in bone callus strength), together with the downregulated expression of osteoblast-related genes.

conclusionDietary restriction had detrimental effects on osseous healing, with a healing delay and a lower quality of bone callus formation.

Indexed as

MalnutritionAnimalsBone DensityBony CallusFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFracture HealingFractures, ClosedMaleOsteoporosisRatsRats, Wistar

Identifiers

PMID30785503
PMCPMC6585920
OpenAlexW2913128901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.