Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
M Görkem Patir-NebiogluDepartment Cell Biology, Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7713-1098
Zaida AndrésDepartment Cell Biology, Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4681-0290
Melanie KrebsDepartment Cell Biology, Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian FinkDepartment Cell Biology, Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katarzyna DrzewickaCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH) and DKFZ - ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicolas Stankovic-ValentinCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH) and DKFZ - ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.
Shoji SegamiLaboratory of Cell Dynamics, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Sebastian SchuckCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH) and DKFZ - ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6388-0661
Michael BüttnerMetabolomics Core Technology Platform, Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rüdiger HellMetabolomics Core Technology Platform, Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-4818
Masayoshi MaeshimaLaboratory of Cell Dynamics, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Frauke MelchiorCenter for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University (ZMBH) and DKFZ - ZMBH Alliance, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9546-8797
Karin SchumacherDepartment Cell Biology, Centre for Organismal Studies (COS), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6484-8105
Heidelberg University · DENagoya University · JP
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft AN1323/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHU1151/13-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB1036 (TP15)
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Pyrophosphate (PPi), a byproduct of macromolecule biosynthesis is maintained at low levels by soluble inorganic pyrophosphatases (sPPase) found in all eukaryotes. In plants, H
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Pyrophosphate modulates plant stress responses via SUMOylation. · full record | OpenQuestion