Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785357›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

A second dose of a measles-mumps-rubella vaccine administered to healthy four-to-six-year-old children: a phase III, observer-blind, randomized, safety and immunogenicity study comparing GSK MMR and MMR II with and without DTaP-IPV and varicella vaccines co-administration.

MMR-158 Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01621802 (Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Combined Measles-mumps-rubella Vaccine in Subjects Four to Six Years of Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01621802 phase3completednot on this map

Immunogenicity and Safety Study of GSK Biologicals' Combined Measles-mumps-rubella Vaccine in Subjects Four to Six Years of Age (209762)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2012 to 2015Enrolled4,011ConditionsMeasles-Mumps-RubellaArmsPriorix, M-M-R II, Kinrix, ProQuad
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

MMR-158 Study Groupa See Contributors section.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many countries, a second dose of a combined measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine is recommended at 4-6 years of age - similarly to the booster of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and inactivated polio vaccine (DTaP-IPV) and the second dose of varicella vaccine (VV). Vaccine co-administration is generally encouraged if no interferences exist among the vaccines. This phase IIIa, randomized, controlled trial (NCT01621802) evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of MMR-RIT (Priorix, GSK) when given as a second dose with or without co-administration of DTaP-IPV and VV, using MMR II (M-M-R II, Merck & Co Inc.) as comparator. Antibody geometric mean concentrations or titers (GMCs/GMTs) and response rates to the components of all the administered vaccines were assessed. Solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events were recorded. Four thousand eleven children aged 4-6 years were enrolled. MMR-RIT elicited immune responses that were not inferior to those of MMR II in terms of GMCs and seroresponse rates when administered alone or when co-administered with DTaP-IPV and VV. The immune responses to the co-administered vaccines in MMR-RIT recipients were non-inferior to those in MMR II recipients. MMR-RIT and MMR II demonstrated similar reactogenicity profiles; the most frequent solicited adverse events across vaccine groups and sub-cohorts were local pain and fever. In conclusion, the immunogenicity and safety profiles of MMR-RIT administered with or without DTaP-IPV and VV were similar to those of MMR II.

Indexed as

Immunization, SecondaryImmunogenicity, VaccineAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralChickenpox VaccineChildChild, PreschoolDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccinePoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralChickenpox VaccineDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccinePoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedVaccines, Combinedco-administrationDTaP-IPVimmunogenicityMeasles-mumps-rubella vaccinesafetyvaricella vaccine

Identifiers

PMID30785357
PMCPMC6605865
OpenAlexW3029524692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.