Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785314›Full record

ArticleJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2019

Lessons from Outside and Within: Exploring Advancements in Methodology for Naturopathic Medicine Clinical Research.

Janet Schloss, Erica McIntyre, Amie Steel, Ryan Bradley, Joanna Harnett, Rebecca Reid, Jason Hawrelak, Joshua Goldenberg, Claudine Van De Venter, Kieran Cooley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The use of complementary medicine in palliative care in France: an observational cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Janet Schloss1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Erica McIntyre1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Amie Steel1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Ryan Bradley1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Joanna Harnett1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Rebecca Reid1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Jason Hawrelak1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Joshua Goldenberg1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Claudine Van De Venter1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
Kieran Cooley1 Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, Ultimo, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AUEndeavour College of Natural Health · AUNational University of Natural Medicine · USUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNaturopathy is a mixture of both traditional and complementary medicine. It incorporates a broad set of health care practices that may or may not be traditional to that country or conventional medicine and are not fully integrated into the dominant health care system. Research required to evaluate or substantiate naturopathic medicine may not fall under the testing of randomized clinical trials, which opens up discussions on what is the best practice for research in naturopathic medicine. DISCUSSION: Not only do advances in health research methodology offer important opportunities to progress naturopathic research, there are also areas where the unique characteristics of naturopathic philosophy and practice can impact other areas of health research. Some of the new advances in health research methodology involve whole-system research, pragmatic trials, template for intervention description and replication protocols for complex interventions, patient-centered care models, and the pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary tool for designing pragmatic trials. Discussion and critique of these health-related methodologies shows that these research methods are more suited for the philosophy and treatment options that naturopathy is based on.

conclusionsSuccessful implementation of naturopathic research methodologies, and translation and dissemination of research will require a substantial paradigm shift in which naturopathic practitioners adopt a greater level of responsibility for developing an evidence base for naturopathic medicine.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchNaturopathyHumansPatient-Centered CareResearch Designnaturopathypatient centeredpragmatic trialsresearch methodologywhole-system research

Identifiers

PMID30785314
PMCPMC6424155
OpenAlexW2912859056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.