Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785205›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

A Systematic Review of Principal Component Analysis-Derived Dietary Patterns in Japanese Adults: Are Major Dietary Patterns Reproducible Within a Country?

Kentaro Murakami, Nana Shinozaki, Aya Fujiwara, Xiaoyi Yuan, Ayumi Hashimoto, Hitomi Fujihashi, Han-Chieh Wang, M Barbara E Livingstone, Satoshi Sasaki

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Perceptions, Knowledge and Culinary Use of Legumes in Australia: A Convenience Sample Analysis.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ecological momentary assessment of meal context and food types contributing to salt intake at meals.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kentaro MurakamiDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nana ShinozakiDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Aya FujiwaraDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Xiaoyi YuanDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumi HashimotoDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitomi FujihashiDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Han-Chieh WangDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
M Barbara E LivingstoneNutrition Innovation Center for Food and Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
Satoshi SasakiDepartment of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA) has been widely used in nutritional epidemiology to derive dietary patterns. However, although PCA-derived dietary patterns are population-dependent, their reproducibility in different populations is largely unexplored. We aimed to investigate whether major dietary patterns are consistently identified among different populations within a country and, if so, how similar these dietary patterns are. We conducted a systematic review of PCA-derived dietary patterns in Japanese adults using PubMed and Web of Science for English articles and Ichushi-Web and CiNii databases for Japanese articles. We assessed the reproducibility of major dietary patterns using congruence coefficients (CCs), with values ≥0.80 considered to represent fair similarity. From 65 articles (80 studies) included in this review, 285 different dietary patterns were identified. Based on the names of these patterns, major dietary patterns were Western (n = 34), Japanese (n = 12), traditional (n = 10), traditional Japanese (n = 9), healthy (n = 18), and prudent (n = 9) patterns. When assessment was limited to high-quality data (i.e., studies based on a sample size ≥200 and use of a validated dietary assessment questionnaire or multiple-day dietary record), the median CC was low for Western (0.44), traditional (0.59), and traditional Japanese (0.31) patterns. Conversely, the median CC was 0.89 for healthy, 0.86 for prudent, and 0.80 for Japanese patterns; and the proportion of pairs with a CC ≥0.80 was 87.3%, 64.3%, and 50.0%, respectively. Characteristics shared among these 3 dietary patterns included higher intakes of mushrooms, seaweeds, vegetables, potatoes, fruits, pulses, and pickles. In conclusion, this systematic review showed that some of the major dietary patterns are relatively reproducible in different populations within a country, whereas others are not. This highlights the importance of careful interpretation of PCA-derived dietary patterns. Our findings in Japan should be confirmed in different countries and globally. This study was registered at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ as CRD42018087669.

Indexed as

AdultAsian PeopleDietDiet RecordsFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansJapanMalePrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairescongruence coefficientdietary patternfactor analysisfood consumption patternprincipal component analysisreproducibilitysimilarity

Identifiers

PMID30785205
PMCPMC6416039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.