Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30785193›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes.

Dennifier Costa Brandão Cruz, Lenon Lima Santana, Alexandre Siqueira Guedes, Jorge Teodoro de Souza, Phellippe Arthur Santos Marbach

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dennifier Costa Brandão CruzCCAAB, Biological Sciences, Recôncavo da Bahia Federal University, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil.
Lenon Lima SantanaCCAAB, Biological Sciences, Recôncavo da Bahia Federal University, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil.
Alexandre Siqueira GuedesAgronomy School, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Jorge Teodoro de SouzaDepartment of Phytopathology, Federal University of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Phellippe Arthur Santos MarbachCCAAB, Biological Sciences, Recôncavo da Bahia Federal University, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade Federal de Lavras · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway may be catalyzed by different enzymes in prokaryotes. The genes that encode these enzymes include homologs of purH, purP, purO and those encoding the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, here named purV and purJ, respectively. In Bacteria, these reactions are mainly catalyzed by the domains AICARFT and IMPCH of PurH. In Archaea, these reactions may be carried out by PurH and also by PurP and PurO, both considered signatures of this domain and analogous to the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, respectively. These genes were searched for in 1,403 completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes publicly available. Our analyses revealed taxonomic patterns for the distribution of these genes and anticorrelations in their occurrence. The analyses of bacterial genomes revealed the existence of genes coding for PurV, PurJ, and PurO, which may no longer be considered signatures of the domain Archaea. Although highly divergent, the PurOs of Archaea and Bacteria show a high level of conservation in the amino acids of the active sites of the protein, allowing us to infer that these enzymes are analogs. Based on the results, we propose that the gene purO was present in the common ancestor of all living beings, whereas the gene encoding PurP emerged after the divergence of Archaea and Bacteria and their isoforms originated in duplication events in the common ancestor of phyla Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota. The results reported here expand our understanding of the diversity and evolution of the last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway in prokaryotes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularArchaeaBacteriaGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialPhylogenyPurinesPurinesArchaeaBacteriabioinformaticscomparative genomicsevolutionphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID30785193
PMCPMC6486802
OpenAlexW2916488234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.