ArticleiScience2019
eDetect: A Fast Error Detection and Correction Tool for Live Cell Imaging Data Analysis.
Article in iScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- LivecellX: A Scalable Deep Learning Framework for Single-Cell Object-Oriented Analysis in Live-Cell Imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Optical microscopic imaging, manipulation, and analysis methods for morphogenesis research.Microscopy (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- Bridging live-cell imaging and next-generation cancer treatment.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2023Review
- Cell region fingerprints enable highly precise single-cell tracking and lineage reconstruction.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Monitoring Virus-Induced Stress Granule Dynamics Using Long-Term Live-Cell Imaging.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- OrganoidTracker: Efficient cell tracking using machine learning and manual error correction.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Live cell imaging has been widely used to generate data for quantitative understanding of cellular dynamics. Various applications have been developed to perform automated imaging data analysis, which often requires tedious manual correction. It remains a challenge to develop an efficient curation method that can analyze massive imaging datasets with high accuracy. Here, we present eDetect, a fast error detection and correction tool that provides a powerful and convenient solution for the curation of live cell imaging analysis results. In eDetect, we propose a gating strategy to distinguish correct and incorrect image analysis results by visualizing image features based on principal component analysis. We demonstrate that this approach can substantially accelerate the data correction process and improve the accuracy of imaging data analysis. eDetect is well documented and designed to be user friendly for non-expert users. It is freely available at https://sites.google.com/view/edetect/ and https://github.com/Zi-Lab/eDetect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.