Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30784726›Full record

Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2019

A double-blind pilot dosing study of low field magnetic stimulation (LFMS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

Marc J Dubin, Irena P Ilieva, Zhi-De Deng, Jeena Thomas, Ashly Cochran, Kamilla Kravets, Benjamin D Brody, Paul J Christos, James H Kocsis, Conor Liston and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marc J DubinDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: mrd9035@med.cornell.edu.
Irena P IlievaDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Zhi-De DengNoninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Jeena ThomasNoninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ashly CochranDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Kamilla KravetsDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Benjamin D BrodyDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Paul J ChristosDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
James H KocsisDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Conor ListonDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Faith M GunningDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
White matter and emotional and cognitive control in late-onset depressionR01MH097735 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GUNNING, FAITH M · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
Chronic Stress Effects on Connectivity in a Limbic CircuitK99MH097822 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LISTON, CONOR M · 2012 to 2013
$209k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH097822NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow field magnetic stimulation is a potentially rapid-acting treatment for depression with mood-enhancing effects in as little as one 20-min session. The most convincing data for LFMS has come from treating bipolar depression. We examined whether LFMS also has rapid mood-enhancing effects in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, and whether these effects are dose-dependent. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that a single 20-min session of LFMS would reduce depressive symptom severity and that the magnitude of this change would be greater after three 20-min sessions than after a single 20-min session.

methodsIn a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 30 participants (age 21-65) with treatment-resistant depression were randomized to three 20-min active or sham LFMS treatments with 48 h between treatments. Response was assessed immediately following LFMS treatment using the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-6), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and the Visual Analog Scale.

resultsFollowing the 3rd session of LFMS, the effect of LFMS on VAS and HAMD-6 was superior to sham (F (1, 24) = 7.45, p = 0.03, Bonferroni-Holm corrected; F (1, 22) = 6.92, p = 0.03, Bonferroni-Holm corrected, respectively). There were no differences between sham and LFMS following the initial or second session with the effect not becoming significant until after the third session.

conclusionsThree 20-min LFMS sessions were required for active LFMS to have a mood-enhancing effect for individuals with treatment-resistant depression. As this effect may be transient, future work should address dosing schedules of longer treatment courses as well as biomarker-based targeting of LFMS to optimize patient selection and treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

AffectMagnetic Field TherapyAdultAgedDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30784726
PMCPMC6486658
OpenAlexW2950129522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.