ArticleMethods in enzymology2019
Cargo encapsulation in bacterial microcompartments: Methods and analysis.
Article in Methods in enzymology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Fidelity In Vitro Packaging of Diverse Synthetic Cargo into Encapsulin Protein Cages.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Modeling bacterial microcompartment architectures for enhanced cyanobacterial carbon fixation.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Linking the Salmonella enterica 1,2-Propanediol Utilization Bacterial Microcompartment Shell to the Enzymatic Core via the Shell Protein PduB.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Vertex protein PduN tunes encapsulated pathway performance by dictating bacterial metabolosome morphology.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Biosynthesis of Linear Protein Nanoarrays Using the Flagellar Axoneme.ACS synthetic biology · 2022Article
- Physiological limitations and opportunities in microbial metabolic engineering.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022Review
- Computational and Experimental Approaches to Controlling Bacterial Microcompartment Assembly.ACS central science · 2021Article
- Prokaryotic Organelles: Bacterial Microcompartments inEcoSal Plus · 2020Review
- Genetic Characterization of a Glycyl Radical Microcompartment Used for 1,2-Propanediol Fermentation by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli CFT073.Journal of bacteriology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic engineers seek to produce high-value products from inexpensive starting materials in a sustainable and cost-effective manner by using microbes as cellular factories. However, pathway development and optimization can be arduous tasks, complicated by pathway bottlenecks and toxicity. Pathway organization has emerged as a potential solution to these issues, and the use of protein- or DNA-based scaffolds has successfully increased the production of several industrially relevant compounds. These efforts demonstrate the usefulness of pathway colocalization and spatial organization for metabolic engineering applications. In particular, scaffolding within an enclosed, subcellular compartment shows great promise for pathway optimization, offering benefits such as increased local enzyme and substrate concentrations, sequestration of toxic or volatile intermediates, and alleviation of cofactor and resource competition with the host. Here, we describe the 1,2-propanediol utilization (Pdu) bacterial microcompartment (MCP) as an enclosed scaffold for pathway sequestration and organization. We first describe methods for controlling Pdu MCP formation, expressing and encapsulating heterologous cargo, and tuning cargo loading levels. We further describe assays for analyzing Pdu MCPs and assessing encapsulation levels. These methods will enable the repurposing of MCPs as tunable nanobioreactors for heterologous pathway encapsulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.