Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30784211›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2019

Comparative analysis of the influence of a high-fat/high-carbohydrate diet on the level of anxiety and neuromotor and cognitive functions in Wistar and DAT-KO rats.

Sergey A Apryatin, Vladimir A Shipelin, Nikita V Trusov, Kristina V Mzhelskaya, Victoria S Evstratova, Natalya V Kirbaeva, Jorge S Soto, Zoia S Fesenko, Raul R Gainetdinov, Ivan V Gmoshinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of Tyrosine and Tryptophan in Rats with Diet-Induced Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergey A ApryatinFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6543-7495
Vladimir A ShipelinFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0015-8735
Nikita V TrusovFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-9297
Kristina V MzhelskayaFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0723-5860
Victoria S EvstratovaFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3732-8547
Natalya V KirbaevaFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-6911
Jorge S SotoFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.
Zoia S FesenkoInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, St. Petersburg State University, Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2074-9081
Raul R GainetdinovInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, St. Petersburg State University, Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2951-6038
Ivan V GmoshinskiFederal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3671-6508
Federal Research Centre of Nutrition and Biotechnology · RUSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared anxiety, neuromotor, and cognitive functions in mutant rats with different allelic variants of dopamine transporter DAT knockout receiving balanced or excess in fat and fructose diet. The experiments were performed in DAT-/- homozygotes, DAT+/- heterozygotes, and DAT+/+ wild type rats. The genotype of DAT-KO rats was confirmed by restriction analysis of DAT gene compared to behavioral responses in the open field test (OF). Animals in the first groups of each strain were fed a balanced AIN93M diet; and those in the second groups with a high-fat/high-fructose diet. Neuromotor function was studied as grip strength, and behavioral responses were assessed in the elevated plus maze and conditioned passive avoidance response tests. The mass of the internal organs and white and brown fat, as well as selected lipid and nitrogen metabolism parameters in blood plasma were determined at the end of the experiment. DAT-/- had the highest specific grip strength, and showed an increase in initial exploratory activity in comparison with DAT+/- and DAT +/+. The exploratory activity was significantly reduced in the second test compared to the first one in DAT-/- and DAT+/- of first but not second group. Anxiety decreased with age in the second groups of DAT+/- and DAT+/+ (but not in DAT-/-) and was higher in DAT+/+ than in DAT+/- and DAT-/-. Excess fat and fructose resulted in the deterioration of short-term memory in DAT+/+. Lipidomic indices of blood plasma were less responsive to diet in DAT-/- and DAT-/+ in comparison to DAT+/+. The increased AsAT/AlAT activity ratio in DAT-/- compared with those in DAT+/+ suggests the activation of catabolism activity in the mutants. The consumption of excess fat and fructose significantly modified the effects produced by DAT gene allelic variants presumably due to the influence on the processes of dopamine metabolism.

Indexed as

CognitionHand StrengthAdipose TissueAnimalsAnxietyDiet, Carbohydrate LoadingDiet, High-FatDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsLipidsMaleMaze LearningRatsRats, WistarDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsLipidsBehavioral reactionsdopamineknockout modelsneuromotor functionrats

Identifiers

PMID30784211
PMCPMC6381039
OpenAlexW2918013097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.