Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30784179›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2019

Mimicking natural polymorphism in eIF4E by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing is associated with resistance to potyviruses.

Anna Bastet, Delyan Zafirov, Nathalie Giovinazzo, Anouchka Guyon-Debast, Fabien Nogué, Christophe Robaglia, Jean-Luc Gallois

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna BastetGAFL, INRA, Montfavet, France.
Delyan ZafirovGAFL, INRA, Montfavet, France.
Nathalie GiovinazzoGAFL, INRA, Montfavet, France.
Anouchka Guyon-DebastInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRA, AgroParisTech, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Fabien NoguéInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRA, AgroParisTech, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Christophe RobagliaLaboratoire de Génétique et Biophysique des Plantes, CEA, CNRS, BIAM, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Jean-Luc GalloisGAFL, INRA, Montfavet, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-1740
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGénétique et amélioration des fruits et légumes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many crop species, natural variation in eIF4E proteins confers resistance to potyviruses. Gene editing offers new opportunities to transfer genetic resistance to crops that seem to lack natural eIF4E alleles. However, because eIF4E are physiologically important proteins, any introduced modification for virus resistance must not bring adverse phenotype effects. In this study, we assessed the role of amino acid substitutions encoded by a Pisum sativum eIF4E virus-resistance allele (W69L, T80D S81D, S84A, G114R and N176K) by introducing them independently into the Arabidopsis thaliana eIF4E1 gene, a susceptibility factor to the Clover yellow vein virus (ClYVV). Results show that most mutations were sufficient to prevent ClYVV accumulation in plants without affecting plant growth. In addition, two of these engineered resistance alleles can be combined with a loss-of-function eIFiso4E to expand the resistance spectrum to other potyviruses. Finally, we use CRISPR-nCas9-cytidine deaminase technology to convert the Arabidopsis eIF4E1 susceptibility allele into a resistance allele by introducing the N176K mutation with a single-point mutation through C-to-G base editing to generate resistant plants. This study shows how combining knowledge on pathogen susceptibility factors with precise genome-editing technologies offers a feasible solution for engineering transgene-free genetic resistance in plants, even across species barriers.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAllelesArabidopsisDisease ResistanceEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EPisum sativumPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedPotyvirusEukaryotic Initiation Factor-4EPlant ProteinsArabidopsis thalianabase editingCRISPR-Cas9cytidine deaminaseeIF4Epotyvirus

Identifiers

PMID30784179
PMCPMC6686125
OpenAlexW2915823955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.