ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020
Myocardial blood flow quantitation in patients with congestive heart failure: head-to-head comparison between rapid-rotating gantry SPECT and CZT SPECT.
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of motion correction on quantitatively measured perfusion indices using cardiac-dedicated dynamic CZT-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion with CZT SPECT and SPECT/CT: Current Limitations and Recommendations for Future Improvements.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- SPECT myocardial blood flow quantitation for the detection of angiographic stenoses with cardiac-dedicated CZT SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic value of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment by NaI(Tl) SPECT in detecting significant stenosis: a prospective, multi-center study.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Myocardial blood flow quantitation with the SPECT technique: Where do we stand?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Reduced acquisition times for measurement of myocardial blood flow withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Diagnostic efficiency of quantification of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve with CZT dynamic SPECT imaging for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparative study with traditional semi-quantitative evaluation.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Article
- Assessment of cardiac amyloidosis withEJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Leveraging latest computer science tools to advance nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecently, the feasibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantitation using rapid-rotating gantry (RRG) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) SPECT cameras has been demonstrated. We compared MBF quantitation using these two camera systems.
methodsTwenty patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and 20 patients without CHF (non-CHF) were included. On two consecutive days, dynamic SPECT imaging was performed after a bolus injection of 20 mCi of
resultsIn both patient groups, there was no significant difference between resting MBF values measured with RRG-SPECT and CZT-SPECT systems (P = 0.06, P = 0.2 respectively). For CHF patients, linear regression (LR) was y(RRG) = 1.0412x (CZT) (r = 0.97) with a small systemic difference (Δ = 0.03 mL·min
conclusionPhysical corrections along with other image corrections can provide comparable MBF quantitations in both CHF and non-CHF patients, regardless of the type of SPECT systems used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30783997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.