Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783944›Full record

ArticleGenetica2019

Genetic analysis of the grapevine genotypes of the Russian Vitis ampelographic collection using iPBS markers.

Alexander Milovanov, Andrey Zvyagin, Asset Daniyarov, Ruslan Kalendar, Leonid Troshin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring Genetic Diversity and Inter-/Intraspecific Polymorphism inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Diversity and Pathogenicity ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander MilovanovDepartment of Viticulture, Kuban State Agrarian University, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia.
Andrey ZvyaginDepartment of Viticulture, Kuban State Agrarian University, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia.
Asset DaniyarovLaboratory of Plants Genomics and Bioinformatics, RSE "National Center for Biotechnology", Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan.
Ruslan KalendarDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre and Helsinki Sustainability Centre, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 5, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. ruslan.kalendar@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-2460
Leonid TroshinDepartment of Viticulture, Kuban State Agrarian University, Krasnodar, 350044, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR05236334Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR05236574Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR06349586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa D.C.) is one of the oldest agricultural crops, each variety comprising an array of clones obtained by vegetative propagation from a selected vine grown from a single seedling. Most clones within a variety are identical, but some show a different form of accession, giving rise to new divergent phenotypes. Understanding the associations among the genotypes within a variety is crucial to efficient management and effective grapevine improvement. Inter-primer binding-site (iPBS) markers may aid in determining the new clones inside closely related genotypes. Following this idea, iPBS markers were used to assess the genetic variation of 33 grapevine genotypes collected from Russia. We used molecular markers to identify the differences among and within five grapevine clonal populations and analysed the variation, using clustering and statistical approaches. Four of a total of 30 PBS primers were selected, based on amplification efficiency. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with PBS primers resulted in a total of 1412 bands ranging from 300 to 6000 bp, with a polymorphism ratio of 44%, ranging from 58 to 75 bands per group. In total, were identified seven private bands in 33 genotypes. Results of molecular variance analysis showed that 40% of the total variation was observed within groups and only 60% between groups. Cluster analysis clearly showed that grapevine genotypes are highly divergent and possess abundant genetic diversities. The iPBS PCR-based genome fingerprinting technology used in this study effectively differentiated genotypes into five grapevine groups and indicated that iPBS markers are useful tools for clonal selection. The number of differences between clones was sufficient to identify them as separate clones of studied varieties containing unique mutations. Our previous phenotypic and phenological studies have confirmed that these genotypes differ from those of maternal plants. This work emphasized the need for a better understanding of the genotypic differences among closely related varieties of grapevine and has implications for the management of its selection processes.

Indexed as

GenotypePhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticGenetic SpeciationRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSelection, GeneticVitisClonal selectionGenetic diversityGrapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. sativa D.C.)Inter-Primer Binding Site (iPBS)Molecular markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.