Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2019
Three-dimensional analysis of morphologic changes and visual outcomes in diabetic macular edema.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early dynamic response on spectral-domain OCT predicts long-term visual outcome in diabetic macular edema treated with aflibercept.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- What Lies beneath Diabetic Macular Edema: Latent Phenotypic Clustering and Differential Treatment Responses to Intravitreal Therapies.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Differences in Artificial Intelligence-Based Macular Fluid Parameters Between Clinical Stages of Diabetic Macular Edema and Their Relationship with Visual Acuity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Morphological changes of foveal cysts as a predictor for visual response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments in diabetic macular edema : Degenerative cyst in DME.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Reflectivity in Foveal Cysts: A Novel Biomarker for Early-Response Prediction of Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Dexamethasone.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Real-World Evidence in the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema with Intravitreal Anti-VEGFs in Asia: A Systematic Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Macular Edema and Visual Acuity Observation after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Challenges in Diabetic Macular Edema Management: An Expert Consensus Report.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the association of retinal fluid volume with the visual and anatomic outcomes of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) after treatment with bevacizumab. STUDY
designRetrospective observational study.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 65 eyes of 58 DME patients treated with bevacizumab. The volumes of the inner intraretinal fluid (IRF) in the inner nuclear layer (INL), outer IRF in the outer plexiform layer (OPL)/outer nuclear layer (ONL), and subretinal fluid (SRF) were calculated. The correlations between the baseline fluid volumes and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), area of disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), disrupted external limiting membrane (ELM), and disrupted ellipsoid zone (EZ) at 12 months after treatment were assessed.
resultsThe baseline volume of the inner IRF correlated with poor BCVA at the final visit (r = 0.52, P < .001) whereas the baseline volume of the outer IRF and SRF volume did not show a significant correlation with BCVA at the final visit (P = .07 and P = .61, respectively). The improvement in BCVA correlated with the reduction in the baseline volume of the inner IRF and outer IRF (r = 0.25, P = .04 and r = 0.36, P = .003), but not with the SRF volume (P = .59). The baseline volume of the inner IRF correlated positively with the area of DRIL and the disrupted ELM at the final visit (r = 0.56, P < .001 and r = 0.25, P = .04, respectively). Such relationship remained in each quadrant of the macula (P < .005 for all quadrants).
conclusionThe baseline volume of the inner IRF correlated with a poor visual outcome, an increased DRIL area, and a more disrupted ELM area in patients with DME after treatment with bevacizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.