Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783883›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Patients' and Providers' Views on Causes and Consequences of Healthcare Fragmentation in the Ambulatory Setting: a Qualitative Study.

Lisa M Kern, Monika M Safford, Masha J Slavin, Evguenia Makovkina, Ahd Fudl, J Emilio Carrillo, Erika L Abramson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Where U.S. Women Receive Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Between Ideal and Actual Care: Patients' and Family Carers' Experiences of Cancer Care Relationships.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fragmentation of healthcare systems: challenges through patients' eyes.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M KernWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. lmk2003@med.cornell.edu.
Monika M SaffordWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Masha J SlavinNewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Evguenia MakovkinaWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Ahd FudlWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Emilio CarrilloWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Erika L AbramsonWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Weill Cornell Medicine · USNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic conditions routinely see multiple outpatient providers, who may or may not communicate with each other. Gaps in information across providers caring for the same patient can lead to harm for patients. However, the exact causes and consequences of healthcare fragmentation are not understood well enough to design interventions to address them.

objectiveWe sought to elicit patients' and providers' views on the causes and consequences of healthcare fragmentation. DESIGN AND

participantsWe conducted a qualitative study with focus groups of patients and, separately, of providers (attending physicians and nurse practitioners) at an academic hospital-based primary care practice in New York City in June-August 2017. Patient participants were English-speaking adults with ≥ 2 chronic conditions. APPROACH: Each focus group lasted 1 h and asked the same two questions: "Why do you think some patients receive care from many different providers and others do not?" and "What do you think happens as a result of patients receiving care from many different providers?" Data collection continued until a point of data saturation was reached. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and subthemes. KEY

resultsWe conducted 6 focus groups with a total of 46 participants (25 patients and 21 providers). Study participants identified 41 unique causes of fragmentation, which originate from 4 different levels of the healthcare system (patient, provider, healthcare organization, and healthcare environment); most causes were not related to medical need. Participants also identified 24 unique consequences of fragmentation, of which 3 were desirable and 21 were undesirable.

conclusionsThe results of this study offer a granular roadmap for how to decrease healthcare fragmentation. The large number and severity of negative consequences (including medical errors, misdiagnosis, increased cost, and provider burnout) underscore the urgent need for interventions to address this problem directly.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient ParticipationQualitative ResearchAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesContinuity of Patient CareFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle Agedambulatory carehealthcare deliveryhealthcare organization

Identifiers

PMID30783883
PMCPMC6544669
OpenAlexW2915404398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.