ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019
Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of video-based peer feedback in self-training for skill acquisition among surgical residents.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Process-oriented feedback for ultrasound-guided central venous access training: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Implementation and Evaluation of a mHealth-Based Community Health Worker Feedback Loop for Hispanics with and at Risk for Diabetes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Trial
- The effect of verbal feedback, video feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Improving inter-rater reliability in radiographic edema scoring in acute respiratory failure through structured training and expert feedback.ATS scholar · 2026Article
- Montessori Principles in Medical Education: Training Innovative and Compassionate Physicians.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence Integration in Radiation Therapy Education: A Multi-Modal Approach.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Optimising feedback provision and literacy in medical training: linking theory to practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The relationship between transition shock and professional identity of nursing interns in China: a moderated mediation effect analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Clinical Feedback as a Relational and Organisational Process: A Qualitative Study of Students' Experiences in Operating Room Environment.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Cultural influences on Asian health profession trainees seeking and receiving feedback: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- How peer coaching can contribute to doctors' development as clinical supervisors: an interview study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Digital health technologies/interventions in smart ward development for elderly patients with diabetes: A perspective from China and beyond.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- The mediating role of feedback-seeking behavior in the relationship between self-efficacy and transition shock of nursing interns: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Feedback: "overly nice" or a "roasting culture"? a student partnership approach in exploring a feedback literacy strategy in undergraduate pharmacy and medical education.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Evaluating Instructor Feedback Practices in a Clinical Learning Environment in a Developing World Setting; a Qualitative Study.Research square · 2024Article
- Exploring the role of digital technology for feedback exchange in clinical training: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Living with a permanent ostomy: a descriptive phenomenological study on postsurgical experiences in patients with colorectal cancer.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Designing feedback processes in the workplace-based learning of undergraduate health professions education: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feedback is defined as a regulatory mechanism where the effect of an action is fed back to modify and improve future action. In medical education, newer conceptualizations of feedback place the learner at the center of the feedback loop and emphasize learner engagement in the entire process. But, learners reject feedback if they doubt its credibility or it conflicts with their self-assessment. Therefore, attention has turned to sociocultural factors that influence feedback-seeking, acceptance, and incorporation into performance. Understanding and application of specific aspects of psychosocial theories could help in designing initiatives that enhance the effect of feedback on learning and growth. In the end, the quality and impact of feedback should be measured by its influence on recipient behavior change, professional growth, and quality of patient care and not the skills of the feedback provider. Our objective is to compare and contrast older and newer definitions of feedback, explore existing feedback models, and highlight principles of relevant psychosocial theories applicable to feedback initiatives. Finally, we aim to apply principles from patient safety initiatives to emphasize a safe and just culture within which feedback conversations occur so that weaknesses are as readily acknowledged and addressed as strengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.