Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783877›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Association of Income Disparities with Patient-Reported Healthcare Experience.

Victor Okunrintemi, Rohan Khera, Erica S Spatz, Joseph A Salami, Javier Valero-Elizondo, Haider J Warraich, Salim S Virani, Ron Blankstein, Michael J Blaha, Timothy M Pawlik and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Shared Decision Making Beyond Shared Identity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Victor OkunrintemiDepartment of Internal Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Rohan KheraDivision of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Erica S SpatzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Joseph A SalamiTeleHealth, eICU, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
Javier Valero-ElizondoCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Haider J WarraichDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Salim S ViraniMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ron BlanksteinBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael J BlahaDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Timothy M PawlikWexner Medical Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kumar DharmarajanClover Health, Jersey City, NJ, USA.
Harlan M KrumholzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Khurram NasirCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. khurram.nasir@yale.edu.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisparities in health outcome exist among patients according to socioeconomic status. However, little is known regarding the differences in healthcare experiences across the various levels of income of patients. In a nationally representative US adult population, we evaluate the differences in healthcare experiences based on patient level of income.

objectivesTo evaluate the differences in patient healthcare experiences based on level of income. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe identified 68,447 individuals (mean age, 48 ± 18 years; 55% female) representing 176.8 million US adults, who had an established healthcare provider in the 2010-2013 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey cohort. This retrospective study examined the differences in all five patient-reported healthcare experience measures (access to care, provider responsiveness, patient-provider communication, shared decision-making, and patient satisfaction) under the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey. We examined the relationship between patient income and their healthcare experience.

resultsOverall, 32% of the study participants were high-income earners while 23% had very-low income. Lower income was consistently associated with poor patient report on healthcare experience. Compared with those with high income, very-low-income-earning participants had 1.63 times greater odds (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.45-1.82) of experiencing difficulty accessing care, had 1.34 times higher odds (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25-1.45) of experiencing poor communication, had higher odds (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.92) of experiencing delays in healthcare delivery, and were more likely to report poor provider satisfaction (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.37-1.61).

conclusionLower income-earning patients have poorer healthcare experience in all aspects of access and quality of care. Targeted policies focusing on improving communication, engagement, and satisfaction are needed to enhance patient healthcare experience for this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth SurveysHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionYoung Adultpatient-reported experiencequality of caresocioeconomic disparities

Identifiers

PMID30783877
PMCPMC6544715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.