Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783865›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2019

Feasibility of Brief Screening for At-Risk Gambling in Consumer Credit Counseling.

Paul Sacco, Jodi Jacobson Frey, Christine Callahan, Martin Hochheimer, Rachel Imboden, Devon Hyde

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Frantic Seeking of Credit during Poker Machine Problem Gambling: A Public Health Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gender Differences in Problem Gamblers in an Online Gambling Setting.Psychology research and behavior management · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul SaccoSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. psacco@ssw.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2800-9571
Jodi Jacobson FreySchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-2673
Christine CallahanSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7365-8060
Martin HochheimerSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-4841
Rachel ImbodenSchool of Social Work, University of Maryland, 525 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-5016
Devon HydeGuidewell Financial Solutions, 757 Frederick Road, Catonsville, MD, 21228, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambling disorder and problem gambling often lead to major suffering in the form of mental health problems, interpersonal conflict, and financial crises. One potential setting for detecting at-risk gambling is credit counseling as gambling problems may manifest themselves in the form of financial distress and bankruptcy. Research studies have not considered those seeking credit counseling as individuals at risk for gambling problems even though gambling may contribute to financial distress. Therefore, the current study sought to quantify the prevalence of at-risk gambling in credit counseling compared with national estimates, to compare at-risk gamblers in this population to lower risk individuals, and to assess the feasibility of gambling screening in these settings. Using a mixed methods approach, the current study found that almost 20% of callers to a national agency reported gambling behavior, and among those who gambled, they reported higher rates of problems related to gambling than the broader U.S. population, thus supporting the idea that screening in credit counseling may help identify those at risk. Low risk gamblers were slightly younger than non-gamblers, but no other differences in sociodemographic and financial status variables were found based on gambling risk status. Results from focus groups and individual interviews suggest that credit counselors and program administrators see the benefit to brief screening within their intake and counseling processes. Our findings suggest that gambling screening is feasible in consumer credit counseling and may be acceptable to staff and administrators at these agencies.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAdultCounselingCounselorsFeasibility StudiesFemaleGamblingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung AdultAt-risk gamblingBrief biosocial gambling screenConsumer credit counselingDebtGambling disorder

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.