ArticleParasitology research2019
Protozoan parasites in Culex pipiens mosquitoes in Vienna.
Article in Parasitology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogen diversity in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from the Republic of Kosovo: a two-year cross-sectional study.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Culex mosquitoes in a French Guiana zoo: insights on species diversity, feeding habits, and parasitic associations.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- The lineage diversity, spatiotemporal distribution and pathological significance ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025Article
- Combining blood meal analysis and parasite detection yields a more comprehensive understanding of insect host feeding patterns.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Seasonal haemosporidian detection in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) and their interactions with vertebrate hosts in a Mexican cloud forest.Parasitology research · 2024Article
- Molecular evidence of pathogens and endosymbionts in the black horse fly Osca lata (Diptera: Tabanidae) in Southern Chile.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Landscape and mosquito community impact the avianiScience · 2024Article
- Surveillance ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Are the Culex pipiens biotypes pipiens, molestus and their hybrids competent vectors of avian Plasmodium?PloS one · 2024Article
- The Roles of Mosquitoes in the Circulation of Monoxenous Trypanosomatids in Temperate Climates.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Invasive Mosquitoes of Canada: An Entomological, Medical, and Veterinary Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022Review
- Geographic and host distribution of haemosporidian parasite lineages from birds of the family Turdidae.Malaria journal · 2020Article
- Morphological and molecular characterization ofParasitology · 2020Article
- Molecular survey on the occurrence of avian haemosporidia,International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Avian malaria (Plasmodium spp.) and kinetoplastid (Trypanosoma spp.) parasites are common vector-borne pathogens in birds worldwide; however, knowledge about vector competence of different mosquito species is currently lacking. For a pilot project examining vector competence of mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens complex and Culex torrentium for protozoan parasites in the city of Vienna, 316 individual mosquitoes were sampled in the months June-August 2017 around the campus of the Veterinary University of Vienna. Since vector competence for avian Plasmodium can only be ascertained by finding infectious sporozoites in mosquito salivary glands, special emphasis was on examining these, or at least insect thoraxes, which contain the salivary glands. After species identification, the mosquitoes were processed in three different ways to determine the best method of visually detecting protozoan parasites in salivary glands: (1) microscopic examination of individual, fixed and Giemsa-stained salivary glands, (2) microscopic examination of stained sections of individually fixed and embedded mosquito thoraxes and (3) stained sections of individual whole insects. Material from all three groups was also subjected to PCR to detect avian haemosporidian and trypanosomatid parasite DNA. PCR was performed on all 316 collected mosquitoes, with 37 pools (n = 2-10) of 263 individuals and 53 single individuals in all together 90 PCR reactions. Avian Plasmodium was found in 18 (20%) and trypanosomatid parasites were found in 10 (11.1%) of the examined samples and pools yielded a higher proportion of positives than did individual samples. Six different species of protozoan parasites were identified, namely Plasmodium vaughani SYAT05 which was the most common, P. elongatum GRW6, P. relictum SGS1, Trypanosoma avium, T. culicavium and Crithidia dedva. Seventy-seven mosquito salivary glands were dissected and stained with Giemsa solution. Of these, one (1.3%) featured sporozoites and one (1.3%) trypanosomatid parasites. While the trypanosomes were identified as T. avium, the avian Plasmodium species were present in a mixed infection with P. vaughani SYAT05 as the dominant species. In conclusion, mosquitoes of the Culex pipiens complex are very likely vectors of different avian Plasmodium and Trypanosoma species and PCR was the most successful and reliable method for parasite detection in mosquito samples, delivering higher rates and more accurate results. The visual detection of parasite stages in the salivary glands was more difficult and only a few specimens were detected using Giemsa stain and chromogenic in situ hybridization. For further studies on vector competence of different protozoan parasites in mosquitoes, the use of PCR-based methods would be preferable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.