ArticleActa neurochirurgica2019
Evaluation of the yield of post-clipping angiography and nationwide current practice.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of 3-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical treatment of intracranial saccular aneurysms aims to prevent (re)hemorrhage by complete occlusion of the aneurysmal lumen. It is unclear whether routine postoperative imaging, to assess aneurysmal occlusion, is necessary since intraoperative assessment by the neurosurgeon may be sufficient. We assessed routine clinical protocols for post-clipping imaging in the Netherlands and determined whether intraoperative assessment of aneurysm clippings sufficiently predicts aneurysm residuals.
methodsA survey was conducted to assess postoperative imaging protocols in centers performing clipping of intracranial aneurysms in the Netherlands (n = 9). Furthermore, a retrospective single-center cohort study was performed to determine the predictive value of intraoperative assessment of aneurysm occlusion in relation to postoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings, between 2009 and 2017.
resultsNo center performed intraoperative DSA in a hybrid OR, routinely. Respectively, four (44.4%), seven (77.8%), and three (33.3%) centers did not routinely perform early postoperative imaging, late follow-up imaging, or any routine imaging at all. Regarding our retrospective study, 106 patients with 132 clipped aneurysms were included. There were 23 residuals ≥ 1 mm (17.4%), of which 10 (43.5%) were unexpected. For the presence of these residuals, intraoperative assessment showed a sensitivity of 56.5%, a specificity of 86.2%, a positive predictive value of 46.4%, and a negative predictive value of 90.4%.
conclusionsThere is lack of consensus regarding the post-clipping imaging strategy in the Netherlands. Since intraoperative assessment is shown to be insufficient to predict postoperative aneurysm residuals, we advocate routine postoperative imaging after aneurysm clipping unless this is not warranted on the basis of patient age, clinical condition, and/or comorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.