ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019
Can posterior implant removal prevent device-related vertebral osteopenia after posterior fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A mean 29-year follow-up study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes following instrumentation removal after posterior corrective fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether posterior implant removal prevents stress-shielding-induced vertebral osteopenia within the posterior fusion area in surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
methodsEighteen patients with major thoracic AIS (mean age, 43.3 years; range, 32-56 years; mean follow-up, 28.8 years, range, 20-39 years) who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) alone between 1973 and 1994 were included. Participants were divided into implant removal (group R, n = 10, mean interval until implant removal, 50 months) and implant non-removal groups (group NR, n = 8). Bone mineral density was evaluated using the Hounsfield units (HU) of the computed tomography image of the full spine. The HU values of the UIV-1 (one level below the uppermost instrumented vertebra), apex, LIV+1 (one level above the lowermost instrumented vertebra), and LIV-1 (one level below the lowermost instrumented vertebra; as a standard value) were obtained. Stress-shielding-induced osteopenia was assessed as the UIV-1/LIV-1, apex/LIV-1, and LIV+1/LIV-1 HU ratios (× 100).
resultsOverall (median, 25th-75th percentile), the apex (144.7, 108.6-176.0) and LIV+1 (159.4, 129.7-172.3) demonstrated lower HU values than LIV-1 (180.3, 149.2-200.2) (both comparisons, p < .05). Comparison of groups R and NR showed no significant differences in the scoliosis correction rate, bone mineral density of the proximal femur, the HU absolute values of all investigated vertebrae, or in the HU ratios of the investigated vertebrae to LIV-1.
conclusionInstrumented PSF causes stress-shielding-induced osteopenia of the vertebral body within the fusion area in adulthood, which cannot be prevented by posterior implant removal, probably due to firm fusion mass formation. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.