Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783787›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2019

Core-needle biopsy in thyroid nodules: performance, accuracy, and complications.

Miguel Paja, Jose Luis Del Cura, Rosa Zabala, Igone Korta, Aitziber Ugalde, José I López

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A simplified four-tier classification for thyroid core needle biopsy.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of core-needle biopsy and repeat fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules with inconclusive initial cytology.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel PajaDepartment of Endocrinology, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Jose Luis Del CuraDepartment of Radiology, Basurto University Hospital, Avda de Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain. joseluis.delcurarodriguez@osakidetza.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4400-8859
Rosa ZabalaDepartment of Radiology, Basurto University Hospital, Avda de Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Igone KortaDepartment of Radiology, Basurto University Hospital, Avda de Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Aitziber UgaldeDepartment of Pathology, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
José I LópezUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain.
Hospital de Basurto · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the performance of core-needle biopsy (CNB) in thyroid using a cohort of patients in which it was used as first choice.

methodsOur institutional review board approved this retrospective study. We reviewed all CNB performed in our center over a period of 11 years. Ultrasound-guided CNBs were performed using a spring-loaded 18-gauge biopsy needle. We used a classification with four diagnostic categories for CNB results: insufficient, benign, follicular lesion (indeterminate), and malignant. Final diagnosis was based on surgical diagnosis or follow-up of at least 2 years in non-operated patients.

resultsThe study included 4412 CNB in 4112 nodules of 3768 patients, 300 of them repeated biopsies. Results were 148 insufficient (3.4%), 3706 benign (84%), 278 follicular lesions (6.3%), and 280 malignant (6.3%). Considering follicular lesion and malignancy CNB results as positive (both lead to the recommendation of surgery) sensitivity was 96% (CI 93.2-97.8) and specificity 93.7% (CI 92.9-94.5). Predictive positive value for a follicular lesion diagnosis was 12.2% and for a malignancy diagnosis, 98.6%. CNB likelihood ratio for malignancy of a malignant diagnosis was 841.9 (CI 315.8-2313.3), of a malignant/follicular lesion diagnosis was 23.4 (CI 20.1-27.3), and of a benign diagnosis was 0.04 (CI 0.02-0.07). Repeated CNB in 53 insufficient biopsies obtained 50 diagnostic results. Minor complications occurred in 2.2% of CNB, and major in four procedures (0.09%).

conclusionsCNB in thyroid nodules is accurate and has few complications and a low rate of non-diagnostic and indeterminate diagnoses. It can be an alternative method when FNAC has poor performance. Repeating biopsy is useful after non-diagnostic biopsies. KEY POINTS: • Core-needle biopsy of thyroid has a low ratio non-diagnostic and indeterminate results. • Core-needle biopsy results are highly reliable, especially benign results. • Complication rate of core-needle biopsy of thyroid is low.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityThyroid NeoplasmsCore-needle biopsyFine-needle aspirationThyroid carcinomaThyroid noduleUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID30783787
OpenAlexW2917580848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.