ArticleHNO2019
[Schirmer test for determining the moisture status of the nasal mucosa].
Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no established method to objectively measure the moisture status of nasal mucosa. In a pilot study it was shown that a nasal Schirmer test is a possible method. The aim of the current study was to check whether the nasal Schirmer test is suitable to define moisture status in cases with an expected pathological secretion. MATERIALS AND
methodsInitially, 154 subjects participated, of whom n = 112 were included (healthy n = 65, deviated septum n = 47, ♂ 60, ♀ 52, median age 33 years). After evaluation of various test strips, the most suitable one was placed on both sides of the mucosa of the anterior septum. Secretion running distance (SRD) was measured in mm after 10 min. In addition, rhinomanometry (AAR) and acoustic rhinometry (AR) were performed. Healthy volunteers and subjects with septum deviation were compared, and subjects were also compared in terms of smoking behavior and age (<60 and ≥60 years).
resultsThe total median SRD was 12 mm. SRDs between 9 and 14 mm were considered physiological. In non-smokers, SRD was significantly higher in all groups compared to smokers (p > 0.05). Nasal side, age, and deviated septum had no significant influence on SRD (p < 0.05). There were no correlations between SRD and AAR or AR.
conclusionOur results confirm that a statement about moisture of the nasal mucosa is possible based on a nasal Schirmer test. Standard values of SRD are relevantly influenced by the respective test strip. Smoking is associated with a drier mucosa. Further investigations on the nasal Schirmer test in patients with expected atrophy of the nose, e. g., Sjogren's or empty nose syndrome, should be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.