Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783707›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2020

Protracted postpartum urinary retention-a long-term problem or a transient condition?

Noa Mevorach Zussman, Noa Gonen, Michal Kovo, Hadas Miremberg, Jacob Bar, Alexander Condrea, Shimon Ginath

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noa Mevorach ZussmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel. noamev@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3295-9182
Noa GonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
Michal KovoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
Hadas MirembergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
Jacob BarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
Alexander CondreaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
Shimon GinathDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisProtracted postpartum urinary retention (P-PUR) is a rare puerperal complication of overt urinary retention that proceeds beyond the 3rd postpartum day. Long-term consequences of P-PUR are poorly reported. The objective of the study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with P-PUR with a matched control group, using a validated pelvic floor distress questionnaire.

methodsAll medical files of women diagnosed with P-PUR between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed. The control group was comprised of women who had a consecutive birth, matched in a 1:2 ratio, by maternal age, parity, neonatal birth weight, analgesia, and route of delivery. All women were evaluated for long-term symptoms of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic-organ-prolapse-related complaints by a telephone interview, at least 1 year following their delivery, using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form (PFDI-20) questionnaire.

resultsDuring the study period, there were 27 cases of P-PUR out of 52,662 deliveries (0.051%). There were no differences between the study group (n = 27) and controls (n = 54) in age, BMI (kg/m

conclusionsP-PUR is a rare postpartum complication, yet this disturbing condition has negligible if any clinical impact on long-term urogynecologic disorders. These findings carry a reassuring message to both patients and their health care providers.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinencePelvic Organ ProlapseUrinary RetentionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPelvic FloorPostpartum PeriodPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesFecal incontinencePelvic floor prolapseUrinary incontinenceUrinary retention

Identifiers

PMID30783707
OpenAlexW2915414054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.