Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783556›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

Intravitreal Injection of 1.25% Povidone Iodine Followed by Vitrectomy Using 0.025% Povidone Iodine Irrigation for Treating Endophthalmitis.

Hiroyuki Nakashizuka, Hiroyuki Shimada, Takayuki Hattori, Koji Tanaka, Yorihisa Kitagawa, Kei Shinoda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Povidone iodine-infused pars plana vitrectomy for severeAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Electroretinographic Evaluations of Eyes With Endophthalmitis.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial guide to posterior segment infections.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyuki NakashizukaDivision of Ophthalmology Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University, School of Medicine, Nihon University Hospital, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki ShimadaDivision of Ophthalmology Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University, School of Medicine, Nihon University Hospital, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki HattoriDivision of Ophthalmology Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University, School of Medicine, Nihon University Hospital, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji TanakaDivision of Ophthalmology Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University, School of Medicine, Nihon University Hospital, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yorihisa KitagawaDivision of Ophthalmology Department of Visual Sciences, Nihon University, School of Medicine, Nihon University Hospital, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei ShinodaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Iruma, Saitama, Japan.
Surugadai Nihon University Hospital · JPSaitama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of intravitreal injection (IVI) of 1.25% povidone iodine (PI) followed by vitrectomy using 0.025% PI irrigation for treating endophthalmitis.

methodsProspective case series study. Nine eyes of 8 patients with postoperative or endogenous endophthalmitis treated at the Nihon University Hospital between April 2015 and October 2017 were studied. First, IVI of 0.1 mL/1.25%PI was conducted, followed by anterior chamber irrigation and vitrectomy using 0.025%PI irrigation solution. Corneal epithelial damage, anterior chamber inflammation, and vitreous inflammation were assessed and fundus examinations were performed, using a slit-lamp microscope and indirect ophthalmoscopy. A specular microscope, Goldmann perimetry, and electroretinography (ERG) were also used.

resultsIn all but case 7, endophthalmitis resolved rapidly and good visual acuity was maintained. No adverse events were noted. Furthermore, the perioperative ERG showed improvements in the oscillatory potentials amplitudes on ERG and flicker ERG, as well as in the implicit time of the a-wave, suggesting functional recovery in the retinal outer and inner layers after therapy.

conclusionsIVI of PI followed by vitrectomy was thought to be a safe and effective treatment for endophthalmitis. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: We succeeded in proving the clinical safety of IVI of PI followed by vitrectomy with PI irrigation as well as previous experimental reports. PI is available in world widely, therefore this method will be optimal treatment for endophthalmitis.

Indexed as

electroretinogramendophthalmitisintravitreal injectionpovidone iodinevitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID30783556
PMCPMC6375116
OpenAlexW2911800849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.