Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783541›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2019

Enoxaparin in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury: A randomized clinical trial.

Humain Baharvahdat, Babak Ganjeifar, Hamid Etemadrezaie, Mohammad Farajirad, Samira Zabihyan, Ashkan Mowla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in geriatric trauma patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans in central nervous system injury.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Humain BaharvahdatDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 99199-91766, Iran.
Babak GanjeifarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 99199-91766, Iran.
Hamid EtemadrezaieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 99199-91766, Iran.
Mohammad FarajiradDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 99199-91766, Iran.
Samira ZabihyanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 99199-91766, Iran.
Ashkan MowlaDivision of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Ghaem Hospital · IRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnoxaparin was shown to have a neuroprotective effect in animal models as well as a human study following traumatic brain injury. This study was conducted to assess the effect of enoxaparin on the clinical outcome of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its safety.

methodsThis study is a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. The inclusion criteria were age 16-70, a closed head injury, a postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) between 5 and 8, and a latency time between the injury and entering the study of less than 5 h. The patients were randomized into enoxaparin and placebo groups. In the enoxaparin group, 0.5 mg/kg enoxaparin was injected subcutaneously every 6 h in six total doses. The two groups were compared for the occurrence of intracranial hematoma (ICH) and for clinical neurological outcome, assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

resultsTwenty-seven patients were assigned to the placebo group and 26 to the enoxaparin group. The two groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics, including age, sex, postresuscitation GCS, and best motor response. The occurrence of new ICH or an ICH size increase was insignificantly more frequent in the enoxaparin group than the placebo group (26.9% vs. 7.4%,

conclusionsThis study showed that the early administration of enoxaparin could lead to favorable outcomes in severe TBI patients without significantly increasing cerebral hemorrhagic complications.

Indexed as

Enoxaparinintracranial hematomaoutcometraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID30783541
PMCPMC6367949
OpenAlexW2914333748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.