ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Value analysis of CD69 combined with EGR1 in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Identification and verification of feature biomarkers associated in heart failure by bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Novel human immunomodulatory T cell receptors and their double-edged potential in autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease and cancer.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2021Review
- Identification of biomarkers, pathways, and potential therapeutic targets for heart failure using next-generation sequencing data and bioinformatics analysis.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expression and clinical significance of CD69 and early growth response (EGR1) in plasma of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) were investigated. A total of 194 patients with CHD and 130 healthy subjects, respectively, were selected as CHD and control group, clinical data were collected and coronary angiography was performed. RT-qPCR was used to detect the expression of EGR1. Flow cytometry was used to detect the expression level of CD69 and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the values of relative expression of CD69 and EGR1. The relative expression of CD69 in plasma of patients with CHD was higher than that in control group, while the relative expression of EGR1 was lower than that in control group. The relative expression of EGR1 in plasma of patients with CHD was negatively correlated with lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (r=-0.394 and -0.524, P<0.05), and the relative expression of CD69 in peripheral blood was positively correlated with [Lp(a)] and hs-CRP (r=0.352 and 0.402, P<0.05). The area under curve (AUC) of the relative expression of CD69 in peripheral blood of patients with CHD in evaluating the course of the disease of patients was 0.889 (95% CI: 0.822-0.958). The AUC of the relative expression of EGR1 in plasma in evaluating the course of the disease of patients was 0.933 (95% CI: 0.867-0.978). By the combined detection of CD69 and EGR1, it was found that the AUC was 0.954 (95% CI: 0.887-0.982). The expression level of EGR1 in plasma of patients with CHD decreased, while the expression level of CD69 increased, and both of them were related to the severity of the disease of patients, which could be used as an indicator to evaluate the progression of the patients' conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.