Biodegradable ciprofloxacin-incorporated waterborne polyurethane polymers prevent bacterial biofilm formation

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Experimental and CFD analysis of flow impediments and encrustation in ureteral stents using in vitro urinary tract model.Scientific reports · 2025
   Article
2. Advances in experimental bladder models: bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo approaches for investigating urinary tract infections.BMC urology · 2024
   Review
3. Quinolone Resistance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
   Article
4. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
   Review
5. Testing Anti-Biofilm Polymeric Surfaces: Where to Start?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as