Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783399›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of lifestyle medicine

A Case Study of Health-Related Support Processes in 2 Happy, Gay Couples.

Josh R Novak, Julie Gast, Terry Peak, Rhees Johnson, Rachel Morrey, Madeline Smith, Marissa Souders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of lifestyle medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josh R NovakDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies (JRN, RJ), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-1226
Julie GastDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies (JRN, RJ), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1851-4523
Terry PeakDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies (JRN, RJ), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Rhees JohnsonDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies (JRN, RJ), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Rachel MorreyDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies (JRN, RJ), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Madeline SmithDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies (JRN, RJ), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Marissa SoudersDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies (JRN, RJ), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Utah State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this case study was to explore 2, early-relationship, same-sex couples on the strategies used to support their partner's engagement in health promoting behaviors. A semistructured interview protocol was used to conduct 120-minute interviews with each couple and analyzed using grounded theory methods. Five organizing categories emerged during the analysis, resulting in a conceptual process model of health-related support in same-sex relationships. These categories, provided a snapshot of how processes interact with each other; they were context, relationship dynamics, health support processes, couple adaptation, and balancing physical/relational health. Couples described the balancing of relational and physical health as an ongoing, important theme in the success of health support. Implications for both health prevention and intervention are discussed.

Indexed as

dyadichealth behaviorhealth promotionqualitativesame-sex marriages

Identifiers

PMID30783399
PMCPMC6367874
OpenAlexW2883161172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.