Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783256›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2019

Transcanalicular endoscopic primary dacryoplasty for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Nozomi Matsumura, Toru Suzuki, Satoshi Goto, Takeshi Fujita, Shin Yamane, Maiko Maruyama-Inoue, Kazuaki Kadonosono

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pediatric dacryolith masquerading as congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinical guideline.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Can preoperative lacrimal endoscopic evaluation change the paradigm of conventional lacrimal surgery?Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nozomi MatsumuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, Yokohama City, Japan. kcmceyecare@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8925-815X
Toru SuzukiSuzuki Eye Clinic, Kitakyushu City, Japan.
Satoshi GotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi FujitaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, Yokohama City, Japan.
Shin YamaneDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-technology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama City, Japan.
Maiko Maruyama-InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-technology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama City, Japan.
Kazuaki KadonosonoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-technology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama City, Japan.
Yokohama City University Medical Center · JPKanagawa Children's Medical Center · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPSuzuki (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the causes of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) using dacryoendoscopy, and to evaluate the surgical outcomes of primary transcanalicular endoscopic dacryoplasty.

methodsThe subjects of this study were a total of 56 eyes of 46 Japanese children aged one to five years old (mean, 29.1 ± 14.0 months old) with clinically diagnosed CNLDO. The blockage was visualized and probed using a dacryoendoscope (MD10 with a 20 G probe, Fiber Tech Co., Ltd., Japan) under general anesthesia. We used a self-retaining bicanalicular lacrimal stent (Lacrifast®, Kaneka Co., Ltd., Japan) for nasolacrimal duct intubation.

resultsIn each case the obstruction was found to be caused by a single focal blockage at the distal end of the duct. A nasolacrimal dacryolith was observed in 5 eyes (9%) and successfully removed using the dacryoendoscope. The success rate of probing by subsequent nasolacrimal duct intubation was 100%. No complications were observed.

conclusionsWe obtained a 100% success rate with primary transcanalicular endoscopic dacryoplasty for the treatment of CNLDO. Direct visualization inside the lacrimal passage allowed for precise probing, even in infants, leading to successful treatment of CNLDO without any complications.

Indexed as

StentsChild, PreschoolDacryocystorhinostomyEndoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantIntubationLacrimal Duct ObstructionMaleNasolacrimal DuctProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30783256
PMCPMC6707219
OpenAlexW2917585556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.