Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783204›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2019

A phase 1b/2, open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-confirmation study of eribulin mesilate in combination with capecitabine.

Chris Twelves, Alan Anthoney, Claudio I Savulsky, Matthew Guo, Larisa Reyderman, Nicola Cresti, Vladimir Semiglazov, Constanta Timcheva, Ishtiaq Zubairi, Rosemary Morrison and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Chris TwelvesLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK. C.J.Twelves@leeds.ac.uk.
Alan AnthoneyLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.
Claudio I SavulskyClinical Development Oncology, Oncology Production Creation Unit, Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, UK.
Matthew GuoBiostatistics, Oncology PCU, Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
Larisa ReydermanClinical Pharmacology and Translational Medicine, Oncology, Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
Nicola CrestiNorthern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Vladimir SemiglazovDepartment of Tumors of Reproductive System and Breast Cancer, NN Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia.
Constanta TimchevaMedical Oncology Clinic, Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Nadezhda" Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Ishtiaq ZubairiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
Rosemary MorrisonClinical Research Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
Ruth PlummerNorthern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
T R Jeffry EvansClinical Research Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBEisai (United States) · USLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBEisai (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Oncology NN Petrov · RUNational Institute of Emergency Medicine "Pirogov" · BG

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11650Cancer Research UK 20409Chief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapecitabine and eribulin are widely used as single agents in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and have nonoverlapping toxicities.

methodsIn phase 1b (dose escalation), patients with advanced, treatment-refractory, solid tumours received eribulin mesilate intravenously in 21-day cycles according to schedule 1 (day 1) or schedule 2 (days 1, 8) with twice-daily oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m

resultsDLTs occurred in 4/19 patients (schedule 1) and 2/15 patients (schedule 2). Eribulin pharmacokinetics were dose proportional, irrespective of schedule or capecitabine coadministration. The MTD of eribulin was 1.6 mg/m

conclusionsThe combination of capecitabine and eribulin showed promising efficacy with manageable tolerability in patients with MBC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPolyether PolyketidesProgression-Free SurvivalCapecitabineeribulinFuransKetonesPolyether Polyketides

Identifiers

PMID30783204
PMCPMC6461928
OpenAlexW2915107893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.