Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30783071›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics2019

Improving Pleasure and Motivation in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Jérôme Favrod, Alexandra Nguyen, Joséphine Chaix, Joanie Pellet, Laurent Frobert, Caroline Fankhauser, Alban Ismailaj, Armando Brana, Gwennaïg Tamic, Caroline Suter and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02593058 (Positive Emotions Program for Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02593058 nacompletednot on this map

Positive Emotions Program for Schizophrenia (PEPS): A Randomized Controlled Study on Improving Pleasure and Motivation in Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut et Haute Ecole de la Santé la SourceRan2016 to 2018Enrolled80ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizoaffective DisorderArmsPositive Emotions Program for Schizophrenia, Treatment As Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Motivation and Pleasure Deficits Undermine the Benefits of Social Affiliation in Psychosis.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. EPA guidance on treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jérôme FavrodLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, j.favrod@ecolelasource.ch.
Alexandra NguyenLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Joséphine ChaixLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Joanie PelletLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurent FrobertLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Caroline FankhauserLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alban IsmailajSISP SA, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Armando BranaHorizonSud, Marsens, Switzerland.
Gwennaïg TamicFondation Stanislas, Montherod, Switzerland.
Caroline SuterLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Shyhrete RexhajLa Source, School of Nursing Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe GolayCommunity Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Charles BonsackCommunity Psychiatry Service, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHInternational Museum of Horology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative symptoms are frequent in patients with schizophrenia and are associated with marked impairments in social functioning. The efficacy of drug-based treatments and psychological interventions on primary negative symptoms remains limited. The Positive Emotions Programme for Schizophrenia (PEPS) is designed to improve pleasure and motivation in schizophrenia patients by targeting emotion regulation and cognitive skills relevant to apathy and anhedonia. The main hypothesis of this study is that patients who attend 8 one-hour sessions of PEPS and treatment as usual (TAU) will have lower total apathy-avolition and anhedonia-asociality composite scores on the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) than patients who attend only TAU.

methodsEighty participants diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomized to receive either TAU or PEPS + TAU. The participants were assessed by independent evaluators before randomization (T0), in a post-test after 8 weeks of treatment (T1) and at a 6-month follow-up (T2).

resultsThe post-test results and 6-month follow-up assessments according to an intention-to-treat analysis showed that the apathy and anhedonia composite scores on the SANS indicated statistically greater clinical improvements in PEPS participants than in non-PEPS participants. In the post-test, anhedonia but not apathy was significantly improved, thus favouring the PEPS condition. These results were sustained at the 6-month follow-up.

conclusionsPEPS is an effective intervention to reduce anhedonia in schizophrenia. PEPS is a short, easy-to-use, group-based, freely available intervention that is easy to implement in a variety of environments (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02593058).

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMotivationPleasureSchizophrenic PsychologyAdultAnhedoniaApathyFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophreniaTreatment OutcomeAnhedoniaApathyNegative symptomsPositive psychologyRandomized controlled trialSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30783071
PMCPMC6518864
OpenAlexW2917808871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.