ArticleHormone research in paediatrics2018
Psychosocial Screening in Disorders/Differences of Sex Development: Psychometric Evaluation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool.
Article in Hormone research in paediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of a parent-reported outcome measure for young boys with a condition affecting sex development (PRO-CSD).Archives of disease in childhood · 2025Article
- Stigma in differences of sex development: a scoping review.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- Differences of sex development.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Vaginal Reconstruction in the Pediatric Population: An Analysis of a National Database.Journal of pediatric surgery · 2023Article
- Cohort profile: pathways to care among people with disorders of sex development (DSD).BMJ open · 2022Article
- Differences/Disorders of Sex Development: Medical Conditions at the Intersection of Sex and Gender.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2022Review
- Descriptive Study of Gender Dysphoria and Sexual Behavior in a Disorder of Sex Development Group.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- "Good practices" in pediatric clinical care for disorders/differences of sex development.Endocrine · 2021Article
- Distress Trajectories for Parents of Children With DSD: A Growth Mixture Model.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2021Article
- Psychosocial Functioning Among Children With and Without Differences of Sex Development.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2021Article
- Neurodevelopmental and Mental Health Screening for Patients with Turner Syndrome in Pediatric Endocrine Clinics: Results of a Pediatric Endocrine Society Survey.Hormone research in paediatrics · 2020Article
- Screening for caregiver psychosocial risk in children with medical complexity: a cross-sectional study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2020Article
- Parent-reported outcomes in young children with disorders/differences of sex development.International journal of pediatric endocrinology · 2020Article
- Predictors of Psychosocial Distress in Parents of Young Children with Disorders of Sex Development.The Journal of urology · 2019Article
- A shared decision-making tool for individuals living with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.Seminars in pediatric surgery · 2019Article
- Long-term Outcomes of Gender Decisions in Differences of Sex Development (DSD) from an Indian Perspective: A Multicenter Study.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsUtilization of a psychosocial screener to identify families affected by a disorder/difference of sex development (DSD) and at risk for adjustment challenges may facilitate efficient use of team resources to optimize care. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) has been used in other pediatric conditions. The current study explored the reliability and validity of the PAT (modified for use within the DSD population; PAT-DSD).
methodsParticipants were 197 families enrolled in the DSD-Translational Research Network (DSD-TRN) who completed a PAT-DSD during a DSD clinic visit. Psychosocial data were extracted from the DSD-TRN clinical registry. Internal reliability of the PAT-DSD was tested using the Kuder-Richardson-20 coefficient. Validity was examined by exploring the correlation of the PAT-DSD with other measures of caregiver distress and child emotional-behavioral functioning.
resultsOne-third of families demonstrated psychosocial risk (27.9% "Targeted" and 6.1% "Clinical" level of risk). Internal reliability of the PAT-DSD Total score was high (α = 0.86); 4 of 8 subscales met acceptable internal reliability. A priori predicted relationships between the PAT-DSD and other psychosocial measures were supported. The PAT-DSD Total score related to measures of caregiver distress (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and to both caregiver-reported and patient self-reported behavioral problems (r = 0.61, p < 0.00; r = 0.37, p < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study provides evidence for the reliability and validity of the PAT-DSD. Given variability in the internal reliability across subscales, this measure is best used to screen for overall family risk, rather than to assess specific psychosocial concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.