ArticlePediatrics2019
Predictive Validity of a 2-Question Alcohol Screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-Year Follow-up.
Article in Pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emergency Department Screening and Interventions for Adolescents With Substance Use: A Narrative Review.The Journal of emergency medicine · 2024Review
- Adolescent alcohol use predicts cannabis use over a three year follow-up period.Substance abuse · 2022Article
- Brief Underage Alcohol Use Screener Scores Predict Health Risk Behaviors.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2021Article
- Using the NIAAA Brief Alcohol Screener in Social Work Practice for Selected Prevention Targeting Youth.Journal of social work practice in the addictions · 2020Article
- Predictive Validity of the CRAFFT for Substance Use Disorder.Pediatrics · 2019Article
- Alcohol Use Disorder: A Pediatric-Onset Condition Needing Early Detection and Intervention.Pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
26 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2-question screen is a valid adolescent alcohol screening tool. No studies have examined if this tool predicts future alcohol problems. We conducted a study at 16 pediatric emergency departments to determine the tool's predictive validity for alcohol misuse and alcohol use disorders (AUDs).
methodsParticipants (
resultsOf the 2209 participants assigned to follow-up, 1611 (73%) completed a 1-year follow-up, 1591 (72%) completed a 2-year follow-up, and 1377 (62%) completed a 3-year follow-up. The differences in AUDs between baseline NIAAA screen nondrinkers and lower-risk drinkers were statistically significant at 1 year (
conclusionsThe NIAAA 2-question screen can accurately characterize adolescent risk for future AUDs. Future studies are needed to determine optimaluse of the screen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.