Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782952›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Physiotherapy after anterior cervical spine surgery for cervical disc disease: study protocol of a prospective randomised study to compare internet-based neck-specific exercise with prescribed physical activity.

Anneli Peolsson, Gunnel Peterson, Anna Hermansen, Maria Landén Ludvigsson, Åsa Dedering, Håkan Löfgren

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03036007 (Physiotherapy After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Cervical Disc Disease. A Prospective Randomised Study to Compare Internet-based Neck-specific Exercise With Prescribed Physical Activity), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03036007 nacompletednot on this map

Physiotherapy After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Cervical Disc Disease. A Prospective Randomised Study to Compare Internet-based Neck-specific Exercise With Prescribed Physical Activity

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2017 to 2026Enrolled39ConditionsCervical Disc Disease, Radiculopathy, CervicalArmsPrescribed Physical Activity, Exercises with Internet support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effectiveness of physiotherapy and rehabilitation after cervical spinal surgery: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effect of posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty on cervical sagittal balance.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anneli PeolssonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6075-4432
Gunnel PetersonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna HermansenDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria Landén LudvigssonDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Åsa DederingAllied Health Professionals Function, Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Håkan LöfgrenNeuro-Orthopedic Center, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SERyhov Hospital Jönköping · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients suffering from remaining disability after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery for cervical disc disease may be prescribed physical activity (PPA) or neck-specific exercises (NSEs). Currently, we lack data for the success of either approach. There is also a knowledge gap concerning the use of internet-based care for cervical disc disease. The scarcity of these data, and the high proportion of patients with various degrees of incapacity following ACDF, warrant increased efforts to investigate and improve cost-effective rehabilitation. The objective is to compare the effectiveness of a structured, internet-based NSE programme, versus PPA following ACDF surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, multicentre study that includes 140 patients with remaining disability (≥30% on the Neck Disability Index, NDI) following ACDF for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease. Patient recruitment occurs following attendance at routine clinical appointments, scheduled at 3 months postsurgery. Patients are then randomised to one of two groups (70 patients/group) for a 3-month treatment programme/period of either internet-based NSE or PPA. Questionnaires on background data, pain and discomfort, physical and mental capacity, satisfaction with care, and health and workplace factors are completed, along with physical measures of neck-related function conducted by independent test leaders blinded to randomisation. Measures are collected at inclusion, after the 3-month treatments (end of treatment) and at a 2-year follow-up. Radiography will be completed at the 2-year follow-up. Preoperative data will be collected from the Swedish Spine Registry. Data on healthcare consumption, drug use and sick leave will be requested from the relevant national registers. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: This study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Linköping Ref. 2016/283-31 and 2017/91- 32. The scientists are independent with no commercial ties. Patients are recruited after providing written informed consent. Patient data are presented at group level such that no connection to any individual can be made. All data are anonymised when reported, and subject to the Swedish Official Secrets Health Acts. The test leaders are independent and blinded for randomisation. Exercises, both general and neck-specific, have been used extensively in clinical practice and we anticipate no harm from their implementation other than a risk of muscle soreness. Both randomisation groups will receive care that is expected to relieve pain, although the group receiving NSE is expected to demonstrate a greater and more cost-effective improvement versu s the PPA group. Any significant harm or unintended effects in each group will be collected by the test leaders. All questionnaires and test materials are coded by the research group, with code lists stored in locked, fireproof file cabinets, housed at the university in a room with controlled (card-based) access. Only individuals in receipt of a unique website address posted by the researchers can access the programme; patients can neither communicate with each other nor with caregivers via the programme.Study participation might lead to improved rehabilitation versus non-participation, and might therefore be of benefit. The results of this study should also contribute to more effective and flexible rehabilitation, shorter waiting times, lower costs and the possibility to implement our findings on a wider level. DISSEMINATION: If effective, the protocols used in this study can be implemented in existing healthcare structures. The results of the study will be presented in scientific journals and popular science magazines of relevance to health. The findings will also be presented at local, regional, national and international conferences and meetings, as well as in the education of university students and at public lectures. Information about the results will be communicated to the general population in cooperation with patient organisations and the media.

trial registrationNCT03036007.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaCervical VertebraeCost-Benefit AnalysisDecompression, SurgicalHumansInternetIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementMulticenter Studies as TopicOrthopedic ProceduresPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesRadiculopathyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionSwedenrehabilitation medicinespine

Identifiers

PMID30782952
PMCPMC6377535
OpenAlexW2914938177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.