Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782899›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Factors associated with receiving surgical treatment for menorrhagia in England and Wales: findings from a cohort study of the National Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Audit.

Rebecca Sally Geary, Ipek Gurol-Urganci, Amit Kiran, David A Cromwell, Loveleen Bansi-Matharu, Judy Shakespeare, Tahir Mahmood, Jan van der Meulen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Interventions to improve access to care for abnormal uterine bleeding: A systematic scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca Sally GearyDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1417-1057
Ipek Gurol-UrganciDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Amit KiranDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David A CromwellDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Loveleen Bansi-MatharuInstitute of Epidemiology and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Judy ShakespeareRoyal College of General Practitioners, London, UK.
Tahir MahmoodLindsay Stewart Centre for Audit and Clinical Informatics, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.
Jan van der MeulenDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the factors associated with receiving surgery for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in England and Wales.

designNational cohort study.

settingNational Health Service hospitals.

participantsWomen with HMB aged 18-60 who had a new referral to secondary care.

methodsPatient-reported data linked to administrative hospital data. Risk ratios (RR) estimated using multivariable Poisson regression. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Surgery within 1 year of first outpatient clinic visit.

results14 545 women were included. At their first clinic visit, mean age was 42 years, mean symptom severity score was 62 (scale ranging from 0 (least) to 100 (most severe)), 73.9% of women reported having symptoms for >1 year and 30.4% reported no prior treatment in primary care. One year later, 42.6% had received surgery. Of these, 57.8% had endometrial ablation and 37.2% hysterectomy. Women with more severe symptoms were more likely to have received surgery (most vs least severe quintile, 33.1% vs 56.0%; RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 1.7). Surgery was more likely among those who reported prior primary care treatment compared with those who did not (48.0% vs 31.1%; RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 1.6). Surgery was less likely among Asian and more likely among black women, compared with white women. Surgery was not associated with socioeconomic deprivation.

conclusionsReceipt of surgery for HMB depends on symptom severity and prior treatment in primary care. Referral pathways should be locally audited to ensure women with HMB receive care that addresses their individual needs and preferences, especially for those who do not receive treatment in primary care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsian PeopleBlack PeopleCohort StudiesEndometrial Ablation TechniquesEndometriosisEnglandFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansHysterectomyLeiomyomaMenorrhagiaMiddle AgedPrimary Health Careauditepidemiologygynaecology

Identifiers

PMID30782899
PMCPMC6377553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.