Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782893›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

HORYZONS trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a moderated online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from first-episode psychosis services.

Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Sarah Bendall, Peter Koval, Simon Rice, Daniela Cagliarini, Lee Valentine, Simon D'Alfonso, Christopher Miles, Penni Russon, David L Penn and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Mario Alvarez-JimenezOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah BendallOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter KovalMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Simon RiceOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniela CagliariniOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lee ValentineOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Simon D'AlfonsoOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher MilesOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Penni RussonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David L PennSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jess PhillipsOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Reeva LedermanSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Greg WadleySchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Eoin KillackeyOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Olga Santesteban-EcharriHotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cathrine MihalopoulosSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Helen HerrmanOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cesar Gonzalez-BlanchUniversity Hospital Marques de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
Tamsyn GilbertsonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shalini LalSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Richard ChambersMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rothanthi Daglas-GeorgiouOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cristina LatorreUniversity Hospital 'Virgen del Rocio', Seville, Spain.
Sue M CottonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Patrick D McGorryOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John F GleesonSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUOrygen Youth Health · AUAustralian Catholic University · AUDeakin University · AUDouglas Mental Health University Institute · CAHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESMonash University · AUUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpecialised early intervention services have demonstrated improved outcomes in first-episode psychosis (FEP); however, clinical gains may not be sustained after patients are transferred to regular care. Moreover, many patients with FEP remain socially isolated with poor functional outcomes. To address this, our multidisciplinary team has developed a moderated online social media therapy (HORYZONS) designed to enhance social functioning and maintain clinical gains from specialist FEP services. HORYZONS merges: (1) peer-to-peer social networking; (2) tailored therapeutic interventions; (3) expert and peer-moderation; and (4) new models of psychological therapy (strengths and mindfulness-based interventions) targeting social functioning. The aim of this trial is to determine whether following 2 years of specialised support and 18-month online social media-based intervention (HORYZONS) is superior to 18 months of regular care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-blind randomised controlled trial. The treatment conditions include HORYZONS plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU alone. We recruited 170 young people with FEP, aged 16-27 years, in clinical remission and nearing discharge from Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, Melbourne. The study includes four assessment time points, namely, baseline, 6-month, 12-month and 18-month follow-up. The study is due for completion in July 2018 and included a 40-month recruitment period and an 18-month treatment phase. The primary outcome is social functioning at 18 months. Secondary outcome measures include rate of hospital admissions, cost-effectiveness, vocational status, depression, social support, loneliness, self-esteem, self-efficacy, anxiety, psychological well-being, satisfaction with life, quality of life, positive and negative psychotic symptoms and substance use. Social functioning will be also assessed in real time through our Smartphone Ecological Momentary Assessment tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (2013.146) provided ethics approval for this study. Findings will be made available through scientific journals and forums and to the public via social media and the Orygen website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000009617; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionOnline Social NetworkingPsychotherapyAdolescentAdultEarly Medical InterventionHumansMindfulnessPeer GroupPsychotic DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodSocial SkillsYoung Adultmental healthpsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID30782893
PMCPMC6368148
OpenAlexW2911761513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.