Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782889›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Tuberculosis notification in a private tertiary care teaching hospital in South India: a mixed-methods study.

Archana Siddaiah, Mohammad Naseer Ahmed, Ajay M V Kumar, George D'Souza, Ewan Wilkinson, Thae Maung Maung, Rashmi Rodrigues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular identification ofAfrican health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Implementation of a tuberculosis elimination project, India 2018-2019.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Archana SiddaiahDepartment of Community Health, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mohammad Naseer AhmedSt John's Research Institute, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ajay M V KumarOperational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.
George D'SouzaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ewan WilkinsonInstitute of Medicine, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
Thae Maung MaungDepartment of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Yangon, Myanmar.ORCID 0000-0002-1265-3813
Rashmi RodriguesDepartment of Community Health, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIndia contributes approximately 25% of the 'missing' cases of tuberculosis (TB) globally. Even though ~50% of patients with TB are diagnosed and treated within India's private sector, few are notified to the public healthcare system. India's TB notification policy mandates that all patients with TB are notified through Nikshay (TB notification portal). We undertook this study in a private hospital to assess the proportion notified and factors affecting TB notifications. We explored barriers and probable solutions to TB notification qualitatively from health provider's perspective. STUDY

settingPrivate, tertiary care, teaching hospital in Bengaluru, South India. METHODOLOGY: This was a mixed-methods study. Quantitative component comprised a retrospective review of hospital records between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 to determine TB notifications. The qualitative component comprised key informant interviews and focus groups to elicit the barriers and facilitators of TB notification.

resultsOf 3820 patients diagnosed and treated, 885 (23.2%) were notified. Notifications of sputum smear-positive patients were significantly more likely, while notifications of children were less likely. Qualitative analysis yielded themes reflecting the barriers to TB notification and their solutions. Themes related to barriers were: (1) basic diagnostic procedures and treatment promote notification; (2) misconceptions regarding notification and its process are common among healthcare providers; (3) despite a national notification system other factors have prevented notification of all patients; and (4) establishing hospital systems for notification will go a long way in improving notifications.

conclusionsThe proportion of patients with TB notified by the hospital was low. A comprehensive approach both by the hospital management and the national TB programme is necessary for improving notification. This includes improving awareness among healthcare providers about the requirement for TB notifications, establishing a single notification portal in hospital, digitally linking hospital records to Nikshay and designating one person to be responsible for notification.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDisease NotificationFemaleHospitals, PrivateHospitals, TeachingHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedProfessional Competencemixed-methods researchoperational researchprivate medical collegequalitative researchTB notification

Identifiers

PMID30782889
PMCPMC6377518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.