Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782834›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Paper-based microfluidics for DNA diagnostics of malaria in low resource underserved rural communities.

Julien Reboud, Gaolian Xu, Alice Garrett, Moses Adriko, Zhugen Yang, Edridah M Tukahebwa, Candia Rowell, Jonathan M Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julien ReboudDivision of Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-8405
Gaolian XuNano Biomedical Research Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200030 Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Alice GarrettDivision of Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Moses AdrikoVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Zhugen YangDivision of Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Edridah M TukahebwaVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Candia RowellVector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Jonathan M CooperDivision of Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow, G12 8LT Glasgow, United Kingdom; jon.cooper@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2358-1050

Funding

European Research Council 340117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid, low-cost, species-specific diagnosis, based upon DNA testing, is becoming important in the treatment of patients with infectious diseases. Here, we demonstrate an innovation that uses origami to enable multiplexed, sensitive assays that rival polymerase chain reactions (PCR) laboratory assays and provide high-quality, fast precision diagnostics for malaria. The paper-based microfluidic technology proposed here combines vertical flow sample-processing steps, including paper folding for whole-blood sample preparation, with an isothermal amplification and a lateral flow detection, incorporating a simple visualization system. Studies were performed in village schools in Uganda with individual diagnoses being completed in <50 min (faster than the standard laboratory-based PCR). The tests, which enabled the diagnosis of malaria species in patients from a finger prick of whole blood, were both highly sensitive and specific, detecting malaria in 98% of infected individuals in a double-blind first-in-human study. Our method was more sensitive than other field-based, benchmark techniques, including optical microscopy and industry standard rapid immunodiagnostic tests, both performed by experienced local healthcare teams (which detected malaria in 86% and 83% of cases, respectively). All assays were independently validated using a real-time double-blinded reference PCR assay. We not only demonstrate that advanced, low-cost DNA-based sensors can be implemented in underserved communities at the point of need but also highlight the challenges associated with developing and implementing new diagnostic technologies in the field, without access to laboratories or infrastructure.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesMedically Underserved AreaPaperRural PopulationAdolescentChildDNA, ProtozoanHumansMalaria, FalciparumMicrofluidicsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsDNA, Protozoanlow-resource settingsmalarianucleic acid-based testspaper microfluidicspoint-of-care diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID30782834
PMCPMC6421471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.