Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782769›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Genomic Prediction of Autotetraploids; Influence of Relationship Matrices, Allele Dosage, and Continuous Genotyping Calls in Phenotype Prediction.

Ivone de Bem Oliveira, Marcio F R Resende, Luis Felipe V Ferrão, Rodrigo R Amadeu, Jeffrey B Endelman, Matias Kirst, Alexandre S G Coelho, Patricio R Munoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ivone de Bem OliveiraBlueberry Breeding and Genomics Lab.ORCID 0000-0003-3723-9747
Marcio F R ResendeSweet Corn Genomics and Breeding, Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0002-2367-0766
Luis Felipe V FerrãoBlueberry Breeding and Genomics Lab.ORCID 0000-0002-9655-4838
Rodrigo R AmadeuBlueberry Breeding and Genomics Lab.ORCID 0000-0001-5127-4448
Jeffrey B EndelmanDepartment of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.ORCID 0000-0003-0957-4337
Matias KirstForest Genomics Lab, School of Forestry Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.
Alexandre S G CoelhoPlant Genetics and Genomics Lab, Agronomy College, Federal University of Goias, GO, Brazil, 74690-900.
Patricio R MunozBlueberry Breeding and Genomics Lab p.munoz@ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-9351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimation of allele dosage, using genomic data, in autopolyploids is challenging and current methods often result in the misclassification of genotypes. Some progress has been made when using SNP arrays, but the major challenge is when using next generation sequencing data. Here we compare the use of read depth as continuous parameterization with ploidy parameterizations in the context of genomic selection (GS). Additionally, different sources of information to build relationship matrices were compared. A real breeding population of the autotetraploid species blueberry (

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticTetraploidyBlueberry PlantsBreedingGene DosageGenetic Association StudiesAllelic dosageAutopolyploidblueberryGenomic PredictionGenomic SelectionGenPredRelationship MatricesShared dataShared Data ResourcesVaccinium

Identifiers

PMID30782769
PMCPMC6469427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.