ArticleBMJ open2019
Towards sustainable healthcare system performance in the 21st century in high-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review of the grey literature.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation of safety management systems (SMS) in healthcare: a systematic review and international comparison.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Online Health Literacy Resources for People With Intellectual Disability: A Grey Literature Scoping Review.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2026Article
- What is known about gambling in lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ+) communities? A scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Global trends in sustainable healthcare research: A bibliometric analysis.Future healthcare journal · 2025Article
- Exercise therapy to improve mobility, active behaviour and quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients with peripheral artery disease: study protocol for the EXACT-CKDPAD multicentre randomised controlled trial.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- Online health literacy resources for people with intellectual disability: protocol for a grey literature scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The Effects of Mobile Primary Health Teams: Evidence from theWorld development · 2024Article
- Key Indicators for Monitoring the Efficiency of Iranian Health System: A Synthesized Design Study.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Decoding hotline's information with text-mining: A protocol for improving tobacco control in Shanghai.Tobacco induced diseases · 2024Article
- Global, regional, and national trends in mesothelioma burden from 1990 to 2019 and the predictions for the next two decades.SSM - population health · 2023Article
- Sustaining improvement of hospital-wide initiative for patient safety and quality: a systematic scoping review.BMJ open quality · 2022Article
- Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder resources for health professionals: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Realist evaluation of the impact of the research translation process on health system sustainability: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- The Application of Systems Science in Nutrition-Related Behaviors and Outcomes Implementation Research: A Scoping Review.Current developments in nutrition · 2021Article
- Article
- Policies to Improve the Mental Health of People Influenced by COVID-19 in China: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- How do foodservice dietitians and dietetic students learn about environmental sustainability? A scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is wide recognition that, if healthcare systems continue along current trajectories, they will become harder to sustain. Ageing populations, accelerating rates of chronic disease, increasing costs, inefficiencies, wasteful spending and low-value care pose significant challenges to healthcare system durability. Sustainable healthcare systems are important to patients, society, policy-makers, public and private funders, the healthcare workforce and researchers. To capture current thinking about improving healthcare system sustainability, we present a protocol for the systematic review of grey literature to capture the current state-of-knowledge and to compliment a review of peer-reviewed literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The proposed search strategy, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, includes Google Advanced Search, snowballing techniques and targeted hand searching of websites of lead organisations such as WHO, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, governments, public policy institutes, universities and non-government organisations. Documents will be selected after reviewing document summaries. Included documents will undergo full-text review. The following criteria will be used: grey literature document; English language; published January 2013-March 2018; relevant to the healthcare delivery system; the content has international or national scope in high-income countries. Documents will be assessed for quality, credibility and objectivity using validated checklists. Descriptive data elements will be extracted: identified sustainability threats, definitions of sustainability, attributes of sustainable healthcare systems, solutions for improvement and outcome measures of sustainability. Data will be analysed using novel text-mining methods to identify common concept themes and meanings. This will be triangulated with the more traditional analysis and concept theming by the researchers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No primary data will be collected, therefore ethical approval will not be sought. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed literature, as conference presentations and as condensed summaries for policy-makers and health system partners. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018103076.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.