ArticleBMJ open2019
Difficult patient-doctor encounters in a Swiss university outpatient clinic: cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Challenging history taking encounters: a systematic review, meta-analysis and phenomenological framework.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Managing patients with mental health conditions in family medicine: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of general practitioners' experiences in Switzerland.Family practice · 2026Article
- Development of Therapeutic Competencies in Health Care Students: Qualitative Focus Group Study Using 360-Degree Video and Virtual Reality Technology.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationships and Attachment Style in Primary Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improving uptake of colorectal cancer screening by complex patients at an academic primary care practice: a feasibility study.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Patients' Satisfaction Regarding Oral Healthcare Services in the North-East Region of Romania: A Preliminary Questionnaire Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigating Patient Satisfaction Through Web-Based Reviews of Norwegian Dentists: Quantitative Study Using the Meaning Extraction Method.Journal of participatory medicine · 2024Article
- Difficult medical encounters in oncology: What physicians need. An exploratory study.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Quality of life, mentalization, and perception of challenging patient encounters in dentistry: A cross-sectional study.BDJ open · 2023Article
- Association Between Physician Empathy and Difficult Patient Encounters: a Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Frequency of Difficult Patient Encounters in a Japanese University Hospital and Community Hospitals: A Cross-sectional Study.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders-importance of communication between physician and patient assessed in a cross-sectional cohort study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Article
- General practitioners referring patients to specialists in tertiary healthcare: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrevious research has shown that multiple factors contribute to healthcare providers perceiving encounters as difficult, and are related to both medical and non-medical demands.
aimTo measure the prevalence and to identify predictors of encounters perceived as difficult by medical residents. DESIGN AND
settingCross-sectional study at the Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine (DACCM), a university outpatient clinic with a long tradition of caring for vulnerable patients.
methodWe identified difficult doctor-patient encounters using the validated Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire (DDPRQ-10), and characterised patients using the patient's vulnerability grid, a validated questionnaire measuring five domains of vulnerability, both completed by medical residents after each encounter. We used a multiple linear regression model with the outcome variable as the DDPRQ-10 score, controlling for resident characteristics.
participantsWe analysed 527 patient encounters performed by all 27 DACCM residents (17 women and 10 men). We asked each medical resident to evaluate 20 consecutive consultations starting on the same date. OUTCOME: One hundred and fifty-seven encounters (29.8%) were perceived as difficult.
resultsAfter adjusting for differences among residents, all five domains of the patient vulnerability grid were independently associated with a difficult encounter: frequent healthcare user; psychological comorbidity; health comorbidity; risky behaviours and a precarious social situation.
conclusionNearly a third of encounters were perceived as difficult by medical residents in our university outpatient clinic that cares for a high proportion of vulnerable patients. This represents twice the average ratio of difficult encounters in general practice. All five domains of patient vulnerability appear to have partial explanatory power on medical residents' perception of difficult patient encounters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.