Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782729›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Outcomes reported in randomised clinical trials of major depressive disorder treatments in adolescents: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Andrea Monsour, Emma J Mew, Peter Szatmari, Sagar Patel, Leena Saeed, Martin Offringa, Nancy J Butcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea MonsourChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emma J MewChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter SzatmariCundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, and Department of Psychiatry, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sagar PatelChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leena SaeedChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Martin OffringaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nancy J ButcherChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5152-0108
Hospital for Sick Children · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a common mental health condition in adolescents. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for assessing the safety and efficacy of interventions in this population. Heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported between RCTs limits the ability to compare, contrast, and combine trial results in a clinically meaningful way. There is currently no core outcome set (COS) available for use in RCTs evaluating interventions in adolescents with MDD. We will conduct a systematic scoping review of outcomes reported in adolescent depression RCTs to assess the variability of trial outcomes and to inform the development of a COS for adolescent MDD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will apply methods based on the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methods manual. RCTs evaluating any treatment intervention for adolescent MDD published in the last 10 years will be located using an electronic bibliographic database search (MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data charting of eligible studies will be performed in duplicate. Outcomes identified will be mapped to an outcome-domain framework. Data analysis will include summary statistics of the characteristics of the included trials and outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of this review will inform the development of a COS for adolescent MDD. The development and implementation of a COS for RCTs evaluating interventions in adolescents with MDD promise to help reduce variability in trial outcome selection, definition, measurement and reporting, ultimately facilitating evidence synthesis that will help to identify the best treatment practices for adolescents with MDD.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentHumansMajor Depressive DisorderRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicScoping Reviews as Topicadolescentclinical trialcore outcome setmajor depressive disorderoutcome reportingsystematic scoping review

Identifiers

PMID30782729
PMCPMC6340428
OpenAlexW2910987508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.