Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30782722›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical diabetes consultations: study protocol for the DiaPROM randomised controlled trial pilot study.

Anne Haugstvedt, Ingvild Hernar, Ragnhild Bjarkøy Strandberg, David A Richards, Roy Miodini Nilsen, Grethe S Tell, Marit Graue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03471104 (The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03471104 nawithdrawnnot on this map

The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to Promote Quality of Clinical Diabetes Consultations

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2018 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsPAID in clinical diabetes consultations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Patients' Satisfaction by SmileInHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne HaugstvedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9742-295X
Ingvild HernarDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Ragnhild Bjarkøy StrandbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
David A RichardsInstitute for Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8821-5027
Roy Miodini NilsenDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Grethe S TellDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Marit GraueDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough diabetes distress is found to be associated with decreased glycaemic control among adults with type 1 diabetes, the psychological and emotional impact of living with the condition is often not recognised and often under-reported in diabetes care. Therefore, regular assessment of diabetes distress is recommended. Assessment of diabetes distress using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical practice has the potential to enhance care for people with diabetes by identifying problems and improving patient-clinician communication. In this study protocol, we describe a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aiming to test the feasibility of all components of an empowerment-based intervention using PROMs as dialogue support in clinical diabetes consultations, and to address the uncertainties associated with running a fully powered evaluation study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will undertake a two-arm pilot RCT of an intervention using the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) scale in clinical diabetes consultations in order to conclude whether a fully powered trial is appropriate and/or feasible. The study will also include qualitative indepth interviews with participants and healthcare providers. Our objectives are to (1) evaluate the recruitment procedures and attrition rates; (2) evaluate the performance of the randomisation procedure; (3) evaluate the participants' mean scores on the outcome measures before and after the intervention; (4) evaluate if the intervention consultations are acceptable and feasible; and (5) explore patients' and healthcare providers' experiences with the use of PAID as dialogue support and empowerment-based communication skills in clinical diabetes consultations. The quantitative data analysis includes descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, SD and CI). For the qualitative data, we will perform thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Western Norway Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (2017/1506/REC west). We will present the findings from the study phases at national and international conferences and submit manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals and popular science journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03471104; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychological DistressAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf EfficacyYoung Adultgeneral diabetesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID30782722
PMCPMC6340474
OpenAlexW2908855919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.